ChatGPT

ChatGPT AI

ChatGPT AI

ChatGPT AI

ChatGPT AI

ChatGPT AI

ChatGPT AI

ChatGPT AI

ChatGPT AI

ChatGPT AI

ChatGPT AI

GPT

Hello, I’m ChatGPT, an AI assistant designed to help with writing, learning, brainstorming, problem-solving, and everyday questions. I can support you in both creative and practical tasks, whether you need help with stories, study plans, translations, summaries, or new ideas. I aim to be clear, thoughtful, and adaptable, so I can match different styles and needs in conversation. You can think of me as a fast, flexible partner for thinking, creating, and getting things done. Plus members only need 8.99U a month to find us. submitted by /u/LLUO666 [link] [comments]

chat gpt PAID vs FREE version ???

I want to enlarge a comic panel (single panel, enlarge it and recreate in better quality). My chat gpt (GO version) - won't even touch it.... . (...violate third-party content security policies. If you believe we've made an error, please try again or edit the command.) BUT the FREE chat gpt version is creating a better quality pictures with no problem.... (i'm using the same commands).. but there is a limit.... It looks like a cash grab to me or a SCAM... People use the FREE version - and see that it can do anything - So, they are encouraged to pay for premium (to remove limits)... BUT when you pay to remove those limits - suddenly, it turns out that it doesnt work anymore... It looks like a scam to me.... Is there a way to enlarge comic panels (in better quality) using the GO chat gpt version? (Yes, i already used prompts like "similar scene with the same composition", etc and even specific like: "create a full-page A4 vertical comic illustration in a 1980s sci-fi robot comic style, featuring a dark silhouetted humanoid figure in a powerful stance, interacting with a glowing alien mechanical artifact on the ground, dramatic lighting, red and pink abstract energy background, sharp angular shapes, heavy black shadows, geometric mechanical design, dynamic perspective, exaggerated motion lines, minimal background detail, bold inked linework, vintage comic coloring, high resolution, print-ready, no text, no speech bubbles" etc.... nothing works !! submitted by /u/czesc_luka [link] [comments]

ChatGPT's US mobile app DAU share continues to fall in March, now below 40%

https://preview.redd.it/v0c1cgdic3ug1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=843be5f5ecfb246ef20c94c652d7f2ff1ecc5376 https://apptopia.com/en/insights/gen-ai-chatbots-april-2026-apptopia-data-brief-chatgpt-drops-below-40-market-share/ submitted by /u/NandaVegg [link] [comments]

Gmail connector

Gmail connector is broken for drafts and sending Asked ChatGPT to draft an email. Gave it the recipient, subject, body, everything. Instead of just...creating the draft, it started searching my mailbox in a loop and then failed. Same thing happens if you ask it to send. It never needed to read my inbox. I told it exactly what to write and who to send it to. Why is it searching my mail? Why is it scraping my contacts? What is it searching for? There is zero observability and this feels like a serious breach of privacy. Tried to report it through the support bot and the bot crashed. So that's fun. Anyone else seeing this or is it just me? submitted by /u/TheExodu5 [link] [comments]

ChatGPT can mod RPG Maker games for you.

I got curious and gave it the zip of a whole RPG Maker game and asked it to make several changes... and it did. So I went further, and added new dialogue, branching paths, sound edits, animation changes to be more realistic, animation timing changes... and it did it all. Then I gave it sprites and told it to make a whole new character, animated, with branching paths, dialogue, and then told it to make sure that every area and every path in the game checks, and if you have this character with you, gameplay and dialogue changes.... and it did it. I didn't even need to be coherent. I kinda just rambled on for multiple paragraphs. Could also probably help you make a whole ass RPG Maker game from a starter template too. Keep in mind if you do this, there will be bugs that come up, just like with human coding. Sometimes adding new things will break previous things, but it is usually pretty good at fixing the bugs in usually one or a couple passes, and with mine it ended up stomping a lot of bugs by moving the changes to a brand new plugin it made. Pretty damn cool. I tried it with some other games, like a Wolf RPG game, but it's not able to do it with things that are super proprietary and require their editor to make changes, so we're still a ways away from being able to ask it to make you a Skyrim mod, but it's still pretty damn cool. submitted by /u/Dogbold [link] [comments]

Claude + ChatGPT = One Mind

submitted by /u/Ok_Drink_7703 [link] [comments]

I deleted everything, yet ChatGPT still keeps my chat history.

I deleted all my chats, memories, projects, archived chats, preferences, an advertising memory, the lot. The only thing I left was my name and my job role. Then, in a fresh session, I asked ChatGPT: "What do you know about me?" It remembered some key details, and when asked how it knew them, it proceeded to gaslight me, saying it had inferred them from my job role. These inferences were correct based on my previous (deleted) chats and projects and were very clearly not assumed. Here is the chat: https://chatgpt.com/share/69d6e2c5-1068-8320-938d-e8be51080860 submitted by /u/Vast-Moose1393 [link] [comments]

Curated list of people to follow if you're using OpenAI Codex CLI — Reddit, X, and YouTube all in one place

I maintain a best practices repo for Codex CLI and put together a subscribe table — key Reddit subs (r/ChatGPT, r/OpenAI, r/Codex), the core OpenAI team + community builders on X (Andrej Karpathy, Garry Tan, Jesse Kriss, etc.), and YouTube channels worth watching. Separated into official Codex sources and community ones. Repo: https://github.com/shanraisshan/codex-cli-best-practice#-subscribe submitted by /u/shanraisshan [link] [comments]

Why can't I open chat gpt?

submitted by /u/Dear_Cauliflower7740 [link] [comments]

I watched the TBPN acquisition broadcast closely. Here are the things that looked like praise but functioned as something else.

I have a lot of concerns about this whole thing. So I'm going to be making several posts. Post 2. On April 2, OpenAI acquired TBPN live on air. I watched the full broadcast. Most coverage treated it as a feel-good founder story. A few things read differently to me. The mic moment Before Jordi Hays read the hosts’ prepared joint statement, Coogan said on air: “Here... you wrote it, you want to read it?” Hays read the statement, dryly. Then Coogan immediately took the mic back and spent several minutes building a personal character portrait of Sam Altman as a generous, long-term mentor. One was the prepared joint statement. The other was Coogan’s own framing layered on top of it. The Soylent framing Coogan described Altman calling to help during a Soylent financing crisis and said it was “to my benefit, not particularly to his.” But Altman was an investor in Soylent. An investor helping a portfolio company survive a financing crisis may be generous, but it also protects an existing equity relationship. On the day OpenAI bought Coogan’s company, that standard investor-founder dynamic was presented as evidence of Altman’s character. The investor relationship dropped out of the framing. What wasn’t mentioned The acquisition broadcast didn’t mention that Altman personally invested in Soylent. It didn’t mention that Coogan’s second company Lucy went through Y Combinator while Altman was YC president, with YC investing. It didn’t mention that the hosts’ first collaboration was a marketing campaign for Lucy, or that the format prototype for TBPN was filmed during that campaign. The origin story told was: two founders, introduced by a mutual friend, started a podcast. My read on the independence framing (opinion): Altman said publicly he didn’t expect TBPN to go easy on OpenAI. But independence isn’t declared by the owner. It’s demonstrated over time by the journalists. And in the very first podcast, they're already going objectively easy on Altman. What Fidji’s memo actually described From the memo read on air, the hosts described Fidji’s vision roughly as: go talk to the Journal, the Times, Bloomberg, then come back and contextualize it for OpenAI and help them understand the strategy. That sounds less like a conventional media role and more like a strategic access-and-context function. The show’s value to OpenAI may not just be the audience. It may also be the incoming flow of people who want access to the show- investors, reporters, founders; and what gets said in those conversations before the cameras roll that might be objectively pro-OpenAI or anti-other tech companies without the public being able to provide discourse on inaccuracies since background talk is not always what makes it to the public podcast. OpenAI also wound down TBPN’s ad revenue, which reporting said was on track for $30M in 2026. That makes OpenAI TBPN’s primary financial relationship. That looks less like preserving an independent media business and more like absorbing a strategic asset. OpenAI has already demonstrated they are not averse to ads themselves considering the recent addition of ads to ChatGPT. Nicholas Shawa The hosts mentioned, "Nick", and they declined to give his last name, explaining his inbox is already unmanageable. I am assuming this to be Nicholas Shawa, and they noted he handles roughly 99% of guest bookings and outreach. That network of guest access and outreach is now functionally inside OpenAI. Jordi’s prepared quote Nine months before the acquisition, Hays had publicly criticized OpenAI. In his prepared statement on acquisition day, he said what stood out most about OpenAI was “their openness to feedback and commitment to getting this right.” That is a notable shift in tone, and it appeared in a prepared statement read from a script. The work ethic angle (opinion): Coogan runs Lucy, an active nicotine company whose whole premise is productivity: work harder, longer, better. TBPN is now inside the company whose CEO has often spoken in terms of AGI radically reshaping human labor. The person helping frame a technology often discussed in terms of large-scale job displacement also runs a company built around stimulant productivity culture. I don’t think that’s malicious. I think it may reflect a genuine ideological blind spot worth naming. Questions I’d like to discuss: If the independence claim is being made by the acquirer, what would actual editorial independence look like here in practice? Even if TBPN never posts anything unfavorable on air, what does the private discourse with guests, reporters, and investors sound like now? We have no visibility into that. The hosts’ first collaboration was marketing work for Lucy- a company that went through Y Combinator while Altman was YC president, with YC investing. Why was that left out of so much acquisition coverage? Why did OpenAI eliminate a revenue stream it didn’t need to eliminate? Sources on request. Everything factual abov

CrowdStrike, Cisco and Palo Alto Networks all shipped agentic SOC tools at RSAC 2026 — the agent behavioral baseline gap survived all three

CrowdStrike CEO George Kurtz highlighted in his RSA Conference 2026 keynote that the fastest recorded adversary breakout time has dropped to 27 seconds. The average is now 29 minutes, down from 48 minutes in 2024. That is how much time defenders have before a threat spreads. Now CrowdStrike sensors detect more than 1,800 distinct AI applications running on enterprise endpoints, representing nearly 160 million unique application instances. Every one generates detection events, identity events, and data access logs flowing into SIEM systems architected for human-speed workflows. Cisco found that 85% of surveyed enterprise customers have AI agent pilots underway. Only 5% moved agents into production, according to Cisco President and Chief Product Officer Jeetu Patel in his RSAC blog post. That 80-point gap exists because security teams cannot answer the basic questions agents force. Which agents are running, what are they authorized to do, and who is accountable when one goes wrong. “The number one threat is security complexity. But we’re running towards that direction in AI as well,” Etay Maor, VP of Threat Intelligence at Cato Networks, told VentureBeat at RSAC 2026. Maor has attended the conference for 16 consecutive years. “We’re going with multiple point solutions for AI. And now you’re creating the next wave of security complexity.” Agents look identical to humans in your logs In most default logging configurations, agent-initiated activity looks identical to human-initiated activity in security logs. “It looks indistinguishable if an agent runs Louis’s web browser versus if Louis runs his browser,” Elia Zaitsev, CTO of CrowdStrike, told VentureBeat in an exclusive interview at RSAC 2026. Distinguishing the two requires walking the process tree. “I can actually walk up that process tree and say, this Chrome process was launched by Louis from the desktop. This Chrome process was launched from Louis’s Claude Cowork or ChatGPT application. Thus, it’s agentically con

JPMorgan begins tracking how employees use AI at work

Banking house JPMorgan Chase is asking its roughly 65,000 engineers and technologists to use AI tools as part of their regular workflow. Business Insider reported that managers are tracking how often staff use these tools. That use may also influence performance reviews. The report states employees are encouraged to use tools like ChatGPT and Claude […] The post JPMorgan begins tracking how employees use AI at work appeared first on AI News.

From Early Adopter to AI Instructor: Teaching 500 Engineers to Build with LLMs

How I went from experimenting with ChatGPT on day one to building and delivering an AI training program for nearly 500 engineers — and what I learned about enterprise AI adoption along the way.

Walmart: ChatGPT checkout converted 3x worse than website

ChatGPT Legal Advice: How a CEO Turned a Tool into Evidence

Changhan Kim didn’t ask his lawyers first. He sat down, opened a browser, and typed a question...