Kling AI, tools for creating imaginative images and videos, based on state-of-art generative AI methods.
Based on the available social mentions, Kling AI is frequently mentioned alongside other major AI video generation tools like Sora and Runway, suggesting it's viewed as a legitimate competitor in the space. Users appear to appreciate having multiple AI model options, with Kling being included in discussions about the "best alternative models" and integrated into platforms offering 70+ AI tools. However, technical limitations are noted, particularly around complex physics simulations like coastal wave dynamics where Kling (along with other generative models) still struggles. The overall sentiment suggests Kling is seen as a viable option in the AI video generation landscape, though specific pricing and detailed user experience feedback wasn't captured in these mentions.
Mentions (30d)
14
1 this week
Reviews
0
Platforms
2
Sentiment
0%
0 positive
Based on the available social mentions, Kling AI is frequently mentioned alongside other major AI video generation tools like Sora and Runway, suggesting it's viewed as a legitimate competitor in the space. Users appear to appreciate having multiple AI model options, with Kling being included in discussions about the "best alternative models" and integrated into platforms offering 70+ AI tools. However, technical limitations are noted, particularly around complex physics simulations like coastal wave dynamics where Kling (along with other generative models) still struggles. The overall sentiment suggests Kling is seen as a viable option in the AI video generation landscape, though specific pricing and detailed user experience feedback wasn't captured in these mentions.
Features
Industry
information technology & services
Employees
82
I built an open-source 6-agent pipeline that generates ready-to-post TikToks from a single command
Got tired of the $30/mo faceless video tools that produce the same generic slop everyone else is posting. So I built my own. Claude Auto-Tok is a fully automated TikTok content factory that runs 6 specialized AI agents in sequence: Research agent — scrapes trending content via ScrapeCreators, scores hooks, checks trend saturation Creative agent — generates multiple hook variations using proven formulas (contradictions, knowledge gaps, bold claims), writes the full script with overlay text Audio agent — ElevenLabs TTS with word-level timing for synced subtitles Visual agent — plans scenes, pulls B-roll from Pexels or generates clips via Kling AI, builds thumbnails Render agent — compiles final 9:16 video in Remotion with 6 different templates (split reveal, terminal, cinematic text, card stacks, zoom focus, rapid cuts) QA agent — scores the video on a 20-point rubric across hook effectiveness, completion rate, thumbnail, and SEO. Triggers up to 2 revision cycles if it doesn't pass One command. ~8 minutes. Ready-to-post video with caption, hashtags, and thumbnail. Cost per video is around $0.05 without AI-generated clips. Supports cron scheduling for 2 videos/day and has TikTok Direct Post API integration for hands-free publishing. Built with TypeScript, Claude via OpenRouter for creative, Gemini 2.5 for research/review, Remotion for rendering. MIT licensed: https://github.com/nullxnothing/claude-auto-tok Would appreciate feedback from anyone running faceless content or automating short-form video. submitted by /u/Pretty_Spell_9967 [link] [comments]
View originalis AI making us better thinkers or just faster workers
I've been using claude daily for about 8 months now and something has been nagging at me that I want to talk about. when I first started using it I was genuinely thinking more, I'd use claude to challenge my assumptions and explore angles I hadn't considered and stress test ideas before committing to them, it felt like having a thinking partner that made my actual reasoning sharper. lately though I've noticed a shift in myself that I don't love, I've started going to claude brfore even I think instead of after, like I'll get a new project at work and instead of sitting with it for a while and forming my own perspective first I'll immediately open claude and say "here's the situation what should I consider" and whatever it gives me becomes the starting framework I work within. The difference is subtle but it matters, in the first version I'm using AI to refine thinking I've already done, in the second version I'm outsourcing the initial thinking entirely and just editing what comes back and those are very different cognitive processes even though the output might look similar. I noticed it most clearly last week when I was doing research for a client project, I had claude pull together an analysis and I was about to send it and then I stopped and asked myself do I actually agree with this or am I just sending it because it sounds smart and I didn't have to think hard to produce it and I genuinely couldn't tell which one it was and that scared me a little. I think there's a version of using claude that makes you sharper and a version that makes you lazier and the line between them is just whether you're thinking first and using AI to go further or skipping the thinking entirely because the AI can produce something passable without it. I do a lot of creative work too, video stuff for clients where I use midjourney for concepts and kling, magic hour and runway for motion references, and I see the same pattern there, when I have a clear creative vision and use the tools to execute it faster the work is great, when I open the tools with no vision and just see what comes out the work is mediocre even though it looks polished. curious if anyone else has caught themselves making this shift and whether you've found a way to stay on the "better thinker" side instead of sliding into the "faster worker" side because I think it's one of the most important questions about how we use these tools and nobody's really talking about it submitted by /u/Major_Cable_8079 [link] [comments]
View originalSora is dead. What's everyone actually using now?
So OpenAI finally pulled the plug on Sora. Can't say I'm shocked honestly. The writing was on the wall for a while with how they handled access and the whole vibe around it felt off. Anyway, doesn't really matter now. Point is a lot of people (myself included) were holding out hoping Sora would be "the one" and now we gotta figure out what actually works. I've been testing pretty much everything over the past few days so figured I'd share what I've landed on(Actually hoping if you guys could guide me better ) For text-to-video (cinematic/realistic stuff): Kling 2.0 looks genuinely impressive for the price Motion quality is wild. Runway Gen-3 still has the edge on pure quality but you'll burn through credits insanely fast. Veo 2 from Google is worth watching but access is still weird For image-to-video / animating stills: Luma Dream Machine works well for quick generations. Magic Hour has been solid for me too, especially for product shots and turning AI images into clips. Not as flashy as Runway but the credits stretch way further which matters if you're actually producing volume. For face swap / lip sync: Honestly here i need your help .For me HeyGen looks fine but i think there might be some better alternative out there For stylized / video-to-video: Kaiber still works. Pika is fun for experimental things(not a fan of their ui) and Kling handles this decent too. Stuff I gave up on: Pika for anything serious (too inconsistent), waiting for any OpenAI video product at this point Curious what everyone else has migrated to. Feels like the landscape just shifted again and I'm probably missing some newer tools. submitted by /u/Healthy-Challenge911 [link] [comments]
View originalI built an MCP server that lets Claude generate images, video, and music — 70+ AI models, one connection
Hey everyone, I've been building Kubeez, an AI media platform, and we just shipped an MCP server that connects directly to Claude. What it does: You connect one MCP server and get access to 70+ AI models for image generation, video generation, music creation, and text-to-speech, all from inside Claude. No switching tabs, no copy-pasting prompts between tools. Models you get access to: Image: Flux 2, Seedream V4.5, Imagen 4, Nano Banana Pro (and more) Video: Veo 3.1, Kling 3.0, Kling 2.6, Seedance 1.5 Pro Music: Full track generation from text prompts Voice: TTS in 70+ languages MCP connection: Server URL: https://mcp.kubeez.com/mcp Auth: OAuth (recommended) or personal access token It supports OAuth so you just sign in and approve, no API key to paste. If your client only takes a token field, you can generate a personal access token from the settings page. How the tools work in Claude: Claude discovers the tools automatically. You can ask it things like: "Generate a product shot of a coffee mug on a marble table" "Create a 5-second video of ocean waves at sunset using Veo 3.1" "Make a lo-fi beat, 60 seconds, chill vibes" "Check my credit balance and tell me which video model gives the best quality per credit" The generation is async. Claude starts the job, polls for status, and returns the CDN URL when it's done. What this unlocks: Once you connect Kubeez to Claude, you basically turn Claude into a full media creation suite. You can build automated workflows, batch generate content, create ad creatives, produce music and voiceovers, all through conversation. It turns Claude from a text assistant into something that can actually produce visual and audio assets on demand. If you try it out, I'd really appreciate any feedback. We're early and actively building, so your input directly shapes what we work on next. You can reply here or DM me. The mcp setup is here https://kubeez.com/settings/mcp Users who sign up receive some free credits to test. Happy to answer questions about the setup or the models. submitted by /u/MeepEw [link] [comments]
View originalAutomated the boring parts of content creation
I've been making content for a while and the tooling situation is genuinely annoying. Every platform wants a subscription. Runway is $35/mo for video only. InVideo locks everything behind their editor. Buffer/Later for scheduling is another $15-20. You end up paying $80-100/mo for a pipeline that you don't even fully control. So I built something and just open sourced it. It's a set of Claude Code slash commands. You type /content:create, answer a few questions (or just give it a topic and let it run), and it takes the whole thing from brief → script → image/video generation → scheduled post. No GUI, no subscription, just your Claude Code session and a few API keys. The pipeline: Images: Gemini Flash for free illustrative images, fal.ai Flux for character-consistent stuff Video: KlingAI through fal.ai (~$0.42 per 5s clip vs $35+/mo for Runway) Voice narration: Chatterbox Turbo running locally (GPU-accelerated if you have one, falls back gracefully if not) Scheduling: self-hosted Postiz → publishes to YouTube, X, LinkedIn simultaneously The thing I'm actually proud of: an AutoResearch loop that pulls your post analytics after each publish cycle and automatically rewrites your generation prompt toward what's actually performing The zero monthly floor thing matters if you're doing this casually. Some months I post a lot, some months I don't. Paying $35/mo when you post twice that month feels bad. Setup is: copy a .claude/ folder into your project, set your env vars, run /content:status to verify everything's connected. That's it. It's rough in places — the Postiz self-hosting setup is genuinely annoying (needs Temporal + Elasticsearch, not just Redis + Postgres like the docs imply). I documented the painful parts in the README including a LinkedIn OAuth patch you have to apply manually because their default scopes require Pages API approval most people don't have. Anyway, code's there, MIT licensed, might be useful to someone. https://github.com/arnaldo-delisio/claude-content-machine submitted by /u/arnaldodelisio [link] [comments]
View originalHow do I preserve my AI character as Sora is shutting down
With Sora shutting down, I’m trying to figure out how to keep my character alive across other AI video platforms, bcz I don't wanna start from scratch again. So I put together a reference package that may help ppl like me. Structure of my saved prompts like this: [Appearance] Hair: color, style, length Eyes: color, shape, distinguishing features Build, height, skin tone Marks: scars, tattoos, birthmarks [Motion] Gait: bouncy, heavy, military Gestures: hand talker, still, deliberate [Style] Color palette Rendering: realistic, anime, stylized Common settings or environments File naming: char_front_happy_natural_light.mp4, it's convenient if you're searching for something specific. If static shots are needed, just screenshot images from your vids For the voice, I prompt my character inside a soundproof booth, and then have him deliver lines in various emotional states. So you have some of the best voice samples you can get from Sora. There are many AI voice-cloning tools that can recreate your original voice, as long as you have enough high-quality material. It isn’t perfect, but it's a reliable backup for the toolbox. Where to Rebuild: Platform Character Fidelity Notes Kling AI Very good Strong consistency Runway Gen-3 Good Reference image support Hailuo Good Budget-friendly Pika Moderate Short clips work better ComfyUI + AnimateDiff Best control Needs local GPU I'm using kling 3.0 on AtlasCloud.ai, just test two or three now, don't wait until you're locked out. I don’t think there’s an AI that has an extension that actually works re-create the things you want, but for now all we can do is save as many vids of your character as possible, maybe in the future there is a model powerful enough to allow you continue using your character submitted by /u/Fresh-Resolution182 [link] [comments]
View originalRIP Sora, here are the best alternative models in 2026
Sora is gone, and free AI models. Will always miss you Sora. It's annoying that I have to replace Sora with other models. I've tested the major video models on r/AtlasCloudAI and and here's my conclusion FYI. Kling3.0 the strongest replacement right now. best overall balance, strongest ecosystem. Text-to-video and image-to-video both work. This is what I'd point most developers toward first. 0.153/s Seedance2.0 beats all the models, but its api is not available yet. Vidu Q3 pro next-gen cinematic quality, still building out API stability. Less established than Kling but showing promise. 0.06/s Wan 2.6 solid prompt following, less censorship 0.018/s Veo 3.1 more mature product, and has actually dealt with IP concerns more explicitly. More expensive, but more stable. 0.09/s I chose Kling, for its balance of quality, price, and API accessibility. It's the most practical Sora alternative for developers and businesses. Choose Seedance if you can get reliable access Choose Vidu if your priority is cinematic visuals Choose Wan if you need strong prompts following and price matters Choose Veo if you’re in a more regulated or brand‑sensitive environment and need a mature product with clearer IP handling Wanna know what are you using for video generation, or any recommendations?... submitted by /u/Which-Jello9157 [link] [comments]
View originalI built a free AI animation studio. Storyboard to finished video, all in one workspace.(RIP Sora)
I'm a software engineer who got into animation. The workflow was painful: story in one doc, image gen in another tool, video gen in another tab, then stitch it together manually. So I built a pipeline that does all of it: AI agents generate story structure, characters, worldview, scripts (~30 seconds) Character studio with consistency across panels (same face, different expressions/poses) Visual canvas that auto-lays out panels from the script Video generation with 11 models (Seedance 2.0, Kling 3.0, Sora, etc.) Export for TikTok, Instagram, manga formats DM or comment if you want to try it. submitted by /u/InfiniteCobbler2073 [link] [comments]
View originalSORA IS SHUTTING DOWN???
I literally just saw the tweet and I cannot believe this is real I genuinely had to read the announcement three times because I thought it was a fake account or something but no it's real, OpenAI is actually killing Sora, the app the API everything, I'm sitting here refreshing twitter trying to find more details and all they've said is "we'll share more soon" which is not an explanation for shutting down the product that was the #1 app on the app store like 5 months ago and the DISNEY DEAL?? the billion dollar investment with Marvel and Pixar and Star Wars characters?? just dead?? apparently a Disney team was literally working with the Sora team last night and didn't know this was coming, imagine finding out your billion dollar partnership is over because your partner "pivoted strategy" overnight I keep thinking about the timeline here because it genuinely doesn't make sense to me, they posted a blog about Sora safety standards YESTERDAY, people were generating videos this morning, and now it's just gone, how do you publish a safety blog for a product you're about to kill in 24 hours the WSJ is saying Altman told staff this frees up compute for coding and enterprise stuff ahead of the IPO and honestly that makes me feel some type of way because it basically confirms Sora was always a shiny demo that got too expensive once the real business math kicked in, millions of people built creative workflows around this thing and it was a side quest the whole time apparently also NBC just reported that Anthropic focusing on coding over video is exactly what pressured OpenAI into this which is kind of poetic, Claude never tried to do video and now it's the reason OpenAI stopped doing video too the AI video space is going to be chaos this week, every creator who was on Sora is about to flood into runway and kling and magic hour and veo 3 all at once and those platforms probably weren't ready for this kind of sudden migration, going to be really interesting to see who actually captures that demand I know some people are going to say "it's just a product shutting down calm down" but this was THE video generation tool that changed how people thought about AI and creativity and it's gone in a tweet with no explanation and no timeline and honestly I think we're allowed to be a little shocked about it is anyone else just genuinely stunned right now or did people see this coming because I absolutely did not submitted by /u/Jealous-Drawer8972 [link] [comments]
View originalI've been using AI video tools in my creative workflow for about 6 months and I want to give an honest assessment of where they're actually useful vs where they're still overhyped
I work as a freelance content creator and videographer and I've been integrating various AI tools into my workflow since late last year, not because I'm an AI enthusiast but because my clients keep asking about them and I figured I should actually understand what these tools can and can't do before I have opinions about them here's my honest assessment after 6 months of daily use across real client projects: where AI tools are genuinely useful right now: style transfer and visual experimentation, this is the clearest win, tools like magic hour and runway let me show clients 5 different visual approaches to their content in 20 minutes instead of spending 3 hours manually grading reference versions, even if the final product is still done traditionally the speed of previsualization has changed how I work background removal and basic compositing, what used to take careful rotoscoping can now be done in seconds for most use cases, not perfect for complex edges but for 80% of social media content it's more than good enough audio cleanup, tools like adobe's AI audio enhancement have saved me on multiple projects where the production audio was rough, this one doesn't get enough attention but it's probably the most practically useful AI application in my workflow where it's still overhyped: full video generation from text prompts, I've tried sora and veo and kling and honestly the outputs are impressive as tech demos but unusable for real client work 90% of the time, the uncanny valley is real and audiences can tell AI editing and automatic cuts, every tool that promises to "edit your video automatically" produces output that feels like it was edited by someone who's never watched a movie, the pacing is always wrong face and body generation for any sustained use, consistency across multiple generations is still a massive problem, anyone telling you they can run a "virtual influencer" without significant manual intervention is leaving out the hours of regeneration and cherry-picking the honest summary: AI is extremely useful as a productivity tool that speeds up specific parts of my existing workflow, it is not useful as a replacement for creative decision-making and it's nowhere close to replacing human editors, cinematographers, or content strategists anyone else working professionally with these tools want to share their honest assessment because I think the conversation is too polarized between "AI will replace everything" and "AI is worthless" when the reality is way more nuanced submitted by /u/Jealous-Drawer8972 [link] [comments]
View originalSora 2 vs Google Veo 3 vs Kling 2.5 for AI video, how does OpenAI's model actually compare?
With sora 2 pro finally available and everyone comparing it to what google and kling are doing, I wanted to share an actual side by side breakdown since I've been using all three for content creation the last couple months. Sora 2 Pro (OpenAI): Clean and consistent visual quality, good physics that keeps improving, and its strongest point is consistency across longer sequences which matters if you're generating multiple clips for the same project. No native audio though, and the cinematic feel doesn't quite match veo. Duration and resolution vary by generation. Google Veo 3: The standout of the three for commercial and brand content. Top tier cinematic quality, most realistic motion and physics, and the killer feature is native audio sync that generates dialogue, sound effects, and music alongside the video. Clips come out at 1080p around 8 seconds. The tradeoff is slower generation compared to the others. Kling 2.5: Excellent for stylized content, anime aesthetics, and product intros. Gives you real directorial control with 15+ camera perspectives and start/end frame support, 5 or 10 second clips at up to 1080p. Less photorealistic than veo but produces results in the stylized and heavily designed space that the other two don't really attempt. Honest take on sora: it's good but it's not the clear leader people expected from openai. The consistency in longer sequences is its strongest point, which matters if you're generating multiple clips for the same project and need them to feel cohesive. But the visual quality and cinematic feel don't match veo 3, and the lack of native audio is a big gap. Veo 3's audio synchronization is the real standout across all three. Getting perfectly synced dialogue, narration, music, and sound effects generated alongside the video cuts post production time dramatically. Neither sora nor kling can touch that right now. Kling brings something different with the 15+ camera perspectives and start/end frame support. For directorial control over specific shot types it gives you more precision, and for stylized content like anime or heavily designed looks it produces results that veo and sora don't really attempt. I access all three through freepik which makes comparison testing fast since I don't have to manage separate credits for each. But the real takeaway is that each model has a lane and none of them have made the others irrelevant yet. submitted by /u/Total_Bedroom_7813 [link] [comments]
View original[D] Solving the "Liquid-Solid Interface" Problem: 116 High-Fidelity Datasets of Coastal Physics (Waves, Saturated Sand, Light Transport)
Modern generative models (Sora, Runway, Kling) still struggle with the complex physics of the shoreline. I’ve spent months capturing 116 datasets from the Arabian Sea to document phenomena that are currently poorly understood by AI: Wave-Object Interaction: Real-world flow around obstacles and backwash dynamics. Phase Transitions: The precise moment of water receding and sand drying (albedo/specular decay). Multi-Layer Light Transport: Transparency and subsurface scattering in varying water depths and lighting angles. Complex Reflectivity: Concurrent reflections on moving waves, foam, and water-saturated sand mirrors. Fluid-on-Fluid Dynamics: Standing waves and counter-flows at river mouths during various tidal stages. Technical Integrity: Zero Motion Blur: Shot at 1/4000s shutter speed. Every bubble and solar sparkle is a sharp geometric reference point. Ultra-Clean Matrix: Professional sensor/optics decontamination. No artifacts, just pure data for segmentation. High-Bitrate: ProRes 422 HQ, preserving 10-bit tonal richness in extreme high-glare (contre-jour) environments. Full Metadata & Labeling: Each set includes precise technical specs (ISO, Shutter, GPS) and comprehensive labeling. I’m looking for professional feedback from the ML/CV community: How "clean" and "complete" are these datasets for your current training pipelines? Access for Evaluation: Light Sample (6.6 GB): Link to Google Drive Full Sets (60+ GB each): Available upon request for researchers and developers. I am interested in whether this level of physical "ground truth" can significantly reduce flickering and geometric artifacts in fluid-surface generation. submitted by /u/Artistic_Monk_8334 [link] [comments]
View originalI built a Claude skill that writes accurate prompts for any AI tool. To stop burning credits on bad prompts. We just hit 600 stars on GitHub‼️
600+ stars, 4000+ traffic on GitHub and the skill keeps getting better from the feedback 🙏 For everyone just finding this -- prompt-master is a free Claude skill that writes the accurate prompts specifically for whatever AI tool you are using. Cursor, Claude Code, GPT, Midjourney, Kling, Eleven Labs anything. Zero wasted credits, No re-prompts, memory built in for long project sessions. What it actually does: Detects which tool you are targeting and routes silently to the exact right approach for that model. Pulls 9 dimensions out of your rough idea so nothing important gets missed -- context, constraints, output format, audience, memory from prior messages, success criteria. 35 credit-killing patterns detected with before and after fixes -- things like no file path when using Cursor, building the whole app in one prompt, adding chain-of-thought to o1 which actually makes it worse. 12 prompt templates that auto-select based on your task -- writing an email needs a completely different structure than prompting Claude Code to build a feature. Templates and patterns live in separate reference files that only load when your specific task needs them -- nothing upfront. Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor, Claude Code, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, Kling, Eleven Labs, basically anything ( Day-to-day, Vibe coding, Corporate, School etc ). The community feedback has been INSANE and every single version is a direct response to what people suggest. v1.4 just dropped with the top requested features yesterday and v1.5 is already being planned and its based on agents. Free and open source. Takes 2 minutes to set up. Give it a try and drop some feedback - DM me if you want the setup guide. Repo: github.com/nidhinjs/prompt-master ⭐ submitted by /u/CompetitionTrick2836 [link] [comments]
View originalI Had a Dream About My Daughter. I Turned It into a Film
I wrote this story from a dream. A father wakes up and there are two of his daughter. Then three. Then five. Each one a copy of a different memory of her. They have to figure out which ones are real. Then I turned it into a film. You can definitely tell I have no background in this stuff but I was blown away at what these tools can do. Tools used: → Story written with Claude (Anthropic) → Stills generated in Midjourney V7 → Video clips animated in Kling AI → Voiceover recorded at home + cleaned in VEED → Score generated with Suno AI → Edited and assembled in VEED Link to full story in comments. submitted by /u/Brilliant_Edge215 [link] [comments]
View originalI tested every new YC AI video generator so you don't have to
I do AI video freelancing on the side and still figuring a lot of it out. but at some point I became the person who tries every new tool that drops which is not bcoz I enjoy burning through free trials but bcoz I kept hoping the next one would fix what the last one couldn't. I am not covering Runway, Kling, Sora or Pika because everyone knows those. You have seen the breakdowns a hundred times. I am using Runway as the benchmark standard throughout because it is the most established reference point most people understand. Everything else gets compared against it so you actually know what you are getting. Also worth noting all of these are compatible with OpenAI prompt structure so if you are already used to prompting in ChatGPT the learning curve on all of these is significantly lower than you think. So lets start Higgsfield (YC W24) More directorial control than Runway honestly. Keyframing, character consistency across shots, actual scene direction rather than just hoping the prompt lands right. If you want to direct rather than just generate this is the one. Worth it if you are serious about client work. Supernormal (YC W22) Built more around meeting and business video content than pure generation. Great if your clients are in the corporate or B2B space and need polished internal video content fast so narrow use case but very good at that specific use case. Luma (YC backed) Most visually organic output I have tested and motion feels natural in a way most generators haven't cracked yet. The problem is character behaviour( figures do things you didn't ask for which on client work is genuinely frustrating).Use it when beauty matters more than control. Magic Hour (YC W24) This one i found out on reddit(idk if it was advertisement) but who cares i had to try it. Sits comfortably between budget tools and Runway on output quality and what sets it apart is the breadth, text to video, image to video, face swap, lip sync, AI headshots all under one roof without switching tabs. Pricing is the most manageable of everything I tested which matters when you are doing actual client work on tight budgets. Not the flashiest tbh but can be consistent for day to day usage without quietly draining your credits . Honest verdict across the YC batch Higgsfield if you want control,Luma(not for client work),Magic hour if you want a full toolkit that won't drain your budget ,supernormal can be tried . None of them fully replace Runway yet but all of them are cheaper and that is the honest reason most of us are looking at them. The gap between these and Runway is closing faster than everyone think. A year from now this list will look very different. I'll be back next week with the next batch. There are more I haven't covered yet and some of them are genuinely worth talking about.Ciao... submitted by /u/Personal_Brilliant39 [link] [comments]
View originalKey features include: When model_name is kling-v1-6 and mode is std: 2 units (equivalent to $0.28), When model_name is kling-v1-6 and mode is pro: 3.5 units (equivalent to $0.49).
Based on 21 social mentions analyzed, 0% of sentiment is positive, 100% neutral, and 0% negative.