The #1 AI-native test automation platform empowering software teams to accelerate releases, ensure software quality, and deliver exceptional user expe
I don't see any actual user reviews or social mentions specifically about "Mabl" (the automated testing platform) in the content you've provided. The social mentions you've shared appear to be about unrelated topics like war coverage, video doorbells, media monopolies, and energy crises - none of which discuss Mabl software. To provide an accurate summary of user sentiment about Mabl, I would need reviews and social mentions that actually reference the Mabl testing platform, its features, pricing, user experience, or performance. Could you please provide relevant content about Mabl specifically?
Mentions (30d)
0
Reviews
0
Platforms
2
Sentiment
0%
0 positive
.png?width=652&height=350&name=AI%20Powered%20Test%20Hero%20from%20Figma%20(1).png)
I don't see any actual user reviews or social mentions specifically about "Mabl" (the automated testing platform) in the content you've provided. The social mentions you've shared appear to be about unrelated topics like war coverage, video doorbells, media monopolies, and energy crises - none of which discuss Mabl software. To provide an accurate summary of user sentiment about Mabl, I would need reviews and social mentions that actually reference the Mabl testing platform, its features, pricing, user experience, or performance. Could you please provide relevant content about Mabl specifically?
Features
Industry
information technology & services
Employees
120
Funding Stage
Series C
Total Funding
$78.0M
Six Days of War, 10 Rationales
On the third day of the war in Iran, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth [called](https://www.war.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/4418959/secretary-of-war-pete-hegseth-and-chairman-of-the-joint-chiefs-of-staff-gen-dan/) Operation Epic Fury the “most-precise aerial operation in history.” A difficult claim to fact-check. More difficult still has been parsing statements from the White House and the Pentagon to figure out, with any exactitude, why we are at war in the first place. So far, the Trump administration has offered at least 10 separate rationales in just six days. Let’s start shortly after the first missiles launched early Saturday morning. In an eight-minute [address](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-E7DIctrzo) posted soon after to his social-media platform, President Trump outlined a few explanations. The reason for war, he said, is to eliminate “imminent threats” from the Iranian regime—threats that “directly endanger the United States, our troops, our bases overseas, and our allies throughout the world.” (Let’s call this Rationale No. 1: the imminent threat.) Also, he said, the objective is to ensure that the regime “can never have a nuclear weapon.” (Rationale No. 2: no nukes.) Also, he added, the objective is to “ensure that the region’s terrorist proxies can no longer destabilize the region or the world.” (Rationale No. 3: halt the militias.) These goals are not incompatible, of course, and all involve degrading Iran’s ability to project force beyond its borders. But just as he appeared to be wrapping up, Trump floated a major new reason: laying the groundwork for the Iranian people to “seize control of your destiny, and to unleash the prosperous and glorious future that is close within your reach.” In other words, “Take over your government.” (Rationale No. 4: regime change.) A couple hours later, Trump said his attention was steadfastly on this last explanation—securing the liberty of the Iranian people from the country’s 47-year theocratic regime. “All I want is freedom for the people,” he told [The Washington Post](https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/02/28/trump-iran-war-regime-change-freedom/) just after 4 a.m. About half an hour later, another justification was evidently on the commander in chief’s mind: “Iran tried to interfere in 2020, 2024 elections to stop Trump, and now faces renewed war with United States,” he [wrote](https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116147572522796874) on Truth Social. The post included a link to a story in a right-wing media outlet purporting to show Iranian election interference. (That seemed enough to constitute Rationale No. 5: election interference, before the sun had even risen over Mar-a-Lago.) Later on Saturday, Trump revisited his second and third rationales for the strikes in an interview with [Axios](https://www.axios.com/2026/02/28/trump-iran-war-israel-off-ramps). He cited the failure of negotiations (led by his son-in-law Jared Kushner and the real-estate developer turned Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff) to reach a deal to end Iran’s nuclear ambitions. And he also spoke about his realization, while writing his speech the day before the bombing started, that Iran had a history of violence in the region: “I saw that every month they did something bad, blew something up or killed someone.” By Saturday afternoon, though, the president was ready to unveil his most ambitious rationale yet. As reports filtered in about the assassination of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, Trump [took to social media](https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116150413051904167) again to declare that the operation would continue “as long as necessary to achieve our objective of PEACE THROUGHOUT THE MIDDLE EAST AND, INDEED, THE WORLD!” (Rationale No. 6.: world peace, an appropriately grand finale for launch day.) On Sunday morning, Trump was back to Rationale No. 2, preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons—with little time to spare, apparently. “If we didn’t do that, they would have had a nuclear weapon within two weeks,” the president [told](https://x.com/JacquiHeinrich/status/2028127909093798201) Fox News, citing a time frame he had not included in his initial remarks. The same morning, the president [told](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-casualties-us-military-operation-iran-khamenei-rcna261212) NBC News that the reason for the launch was simple: “They weren’t willing to say they will not have a nuclear weapon.” (For context: The White House had [announced](https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/06/irans-nuclear-facilities-have-been-obliterated-and-suggestions-otherwise-are-fake-news/) last June that Iranian nuclear facilities had been obliterated and “suggestions otherwise are fake news.” An analysis of satellite images by The New York Times last month [showed](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/06/world/middleeast/iran-missile-nuclear-repairs.html) repairs at key missile sites began shortly after those
View originalThe worst energy crisis in history is on the horizon [very long post]
https://redlib.catsarch.com/r/stupidpol/comments/1rmueer/the_worst_energy_crisis_in_history_is_on_the/ > I don't think I need to talk about how devastating the war on Iran has been for the region. It's a brainless slaughter of human life and wealth that will leave Israel, America, and the Gulf much worse off. > > I work in the oil and gas industry and have had a fascination with energy since I was a kid. I'm telling you as bad as the oil situation sounds, it's going to get significantly worse and while there are a few headlines about how the price of fuel is up, not enough people are warning of a global energy crisis that could come worse than anything ever seen. Honestly most people in my industry even are not taking this seriously enough because almost no one working today was working during the 70s when things were bad. > > I started really following the war on Tuesday and as soon as I dug in I realized how overconfident Wall Street was about this conflict ending. Banks were forecasting oil would go to mid $70s per barrel, up from $65 before the war (remember this number), JP Morgan called it early at $100. That isn't even close to enough. Finally today there have been headlines about how it could go to $150 or $200 in the coming weeks. That is more like it but it could get much worse still. > > **How do you know this will be that bad?** > > The important benchmark I'm using are the oil crises of the 70s. I'll point out that both of those crises were caused by Israel fighting with it's neighbors and revolution in Iran. Both the crisis of 1973 and 1979 saw 6-7% of oil production taken offline resulting in a 400% and 150% spike in the price respectively. With that said, the oil tied up in the Gulf is 3 times that level. Oil isn't just any commodity, you need it to have a functioning society and it's not going away any time soon. Societies that lose access to oil will face collapse. If 20% of the world's car production went offline tomorrow, cars would be more sought after but you can hold on to your car longer, buy a used one, buy one you didn't want, whatever. Losing access to oil means your car won't work at all. 90% of what you need might as well be 0%. You can't to work with 9/10ths of your journey completed. So take that 20% of global production being cut and compare it to the much lower cuts of the 70s which sent the world's economy into recessions and you can't start to see how big the problem is. > > You might be asking if this is so bad why hasn't the world exploded yet? Energy crises can take months to manifest. Oil prices didn't peak after the Ukraine invasion until about six months after the crisis started. Many other energy shortages in the past are similar with months between the start and the peak with a steady climb in between. > > The Strait of Hormuz being closed leaves all that oil and gas with nowhere to go as you might have heard. I'm going to emphasize this more than just here but there are many people saying stuff that have no idea what they're talking about. There is almost no way to get the oil out. Some pipelines are available but two have already been struck by Iran. At best 25% of Gulf oil can be sent on the East-West Arabia pipeline to the Red Sea but that's not even close to enough to relieve the crisis. There were talks to expand that pipeline a few years ago but they fell through. Apparently that stupid line city project was more important to the Arabians than even a little bit of security. > > The headlines you're seeing about shutting down oil and gas production being a headache are more or less accurate. Oil pumps don't have an on/off switch. Shutting down and ramping up production takes time. Another point I'll emphasize more than once: even if the war ended tomorrow, and it doesn't look like it will, shutting down a bunch of production means it's not going to come back anytime soon-which would be whatever if it was 2020 and there was a glut of oil, but it isn't. There was supposed to be a small surplus of oil this year to keep prices down but that's gone now. > > **How and why is there so much damage?** > > If you know where to look there are smart people on this topic who do have a holistic picture of what is going on. But one thing I haven't seen a single person mention is Iran, in attacking their neighbors, is setting up for success when the conflict is over. Their neighbors in the Gulf and to their north in the Caucuses and Central Asia, are their economic competitors. By bombing their energy production Iran is making sure the market will be open for them when the war ends, whether that's in a week or a year. It's in their interest to blow up all the fields, processing plants, refineries, smelters, pipelines and liquefaction facilities while the bullets are flying and they can get away with it. > > On top of all of that, the Gulf States in the region as well as other countries are rivals with Iran so even without the economic picture the Iranians want to strike the
View originalSix Days of War, 10 Rationales
On the third day of the war in Iran, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth [called](https://www.war.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/4418959/secretary-of-war-pete-hegseth-and-chairman-of-the-joint-chiefs-of-staff-gen-dan/) Operation Epic Fury the “most-precise aerial operation in history.” A difficult claim to fact-check. More difficult still has been parsing statements from the White House and the Pentagon to figure out, with any exactitude, why we are at war in the first place. So far, the Trump administration has offered at least 10 separate rationales in just six days. Let’s start shortly after the first missiles launched early Saturday morning. In an eight-minute [address](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-E7DIctrzo) posted soon after to his social-media platform, President Trump outlined a few explanations. The reason for war, he said, is to eliminate “imminent threats” from the Iranian regime—threats that “directly endanger the United States, our troops, our bases overseas, and our allies throughout the world.” (Let’s call this Rationale No. 1: the imminent threat.) Also, he said, the objective is to ensure that the regime “can never have a nuclear weapon.” (Rationale No. 2: no nukes.) Also, he added, the objective is to “ensure that the region’s terrorist proxies can no longer destabilize the region or the world.” (Rationale No. 3: halt the militias.) These goals are not incompatible, of course, and all involve degrading Iran’s ability to project force beyond its borders. But just as he appeared to be wrapping up, Trump floated a major new reason: laying the groundwork for the Iranian people to “seize control of your destiny, and to unleash the prosperous and glorious future that is close within your reach.” In other words, “Take over your government.” (Rationale No. 4: regime change.) A couple hours later, Trump said his attention was steadfastly on this last explanation—securing the liberty of the Iranian people from the country’s 47-year theocratic regime. “All I want is freedom for the people,” he told [The Washington Post](https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/02/28/trump-iran-war-regime-change-freedom/) just after 4 a.m. About half an hour later, another justification was evidently on the commander in chief’s mind: “Iran tried to interfere in 2020, 2024 elections to stop Trump, and now faces renewed war with United States,” he [wrote](https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116147572522796874) on Truth Social. The post included a link to a story in a right-wing media outlet purporting to show Iranian election interference. (That seemed enough to constitute Rationale No. 5: election interference, before the sun had even risen over Mar-a-Lago.) Later on Saturday, Trump revisited his second and third rationales for the strikes in an interview with [Axios](https://www.axios.com/2026/02/28/trump-iran-war-israel-off-ramps). He cited the failure of negotiations (led by his son-in-law Jared Kushner and the real-estate developer turned Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff) to reach a deal to end Iran’s nuclear ambitions. And he also spoke about his realization, while writing his speech the day before the bombing started, that Iran had a history of violence in the region: “I saw that every month they did something bad, blew something up or killed someone.” By Saturday afternoon, though, the president was ready to unveil his most ambitious rationale yet. As reports filtered in about the assassination of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, Trump [took to social media](https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116150413051904167) again to declare that the operation would continue “as long as necessary to achieve our objective of PEACE THROUGHOUT THE MIDDLE EAST AND, INDEED, THE WORLD!” (Rationale No. 6.: world peace, an appropriately grand finale for launch day.) On Sunday morning, Trump was back to Rationale No. 2, preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons—with little time to spare, apparently. “If we didn’t do that, they would have had a nuclear weapon within two weeks,” the president [told](https://x.com/JacquiHeinrich/status/2028127909093798201) Fox News, citing a time frame he had not included in his initial remarks. The same morning, the president [told](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-casualties-us-military-operation-iran-khamenei-rcna261212) NBC News that the reason for the launch was simple: “They weren’t willing to say they will not have a nuclear weapon.” (For context: The White House had [announced](https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/06/irans-nuclear-facilities-have-been-obliterated-and-suggestions-otherwise-are-fake-news/) last June that Iranian nuclear facilities had been obliterated and “suggestions otherwise are fake news.” An analysis of satellite images by The New York Times last month [showed](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/06/world/middleeast/iran-missile-nuclear-repairs.html) repairs at key missile sites began shortly after those
View originalThe Biggest Pro-Trump Mega-Media Monopoly Ever (it’s already distorting war coverage)
[](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!DrD2!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F5ef3e031-24b0-4a62-8b5b-6c00beb0115d_3500x2567.jpeg) Friends, On Sunday, CBS’s erstwhile flagship newsmagazine “60 Minutes” opened with an extended adulatory interview of Reza Pahlavi, son of the late exiled Shah of Iran, whom Trump presumably is auditioning to be Iran’s post-invasion leader. Although Pahlavi is in Paris and hasn’t lived in Iran for nearly a half-century, CBS’s Scott Pelley fed the exiled prince softball questions and allowed him to avoid talking about his father’s record of brutal repression. Pelley even added, in a wishful voiceover, that “Pahlavi told us that there are units within the military and the police that would turn on the hard-line government. He says that many but not all troops could be given amnesty in a process of national reconciliation.” This isn’t news. It’s pablum from the White House. “60 Minutes” was once a reliable source of tough reporting. Now it’s becoming a shill for the Trump regime. It soon could get far worse. CBS News is on the verge of becoming part of the largest pro-Trump media monopoly in America. Two of the nation’s biggest news organizations — CBS News and CNN — along with CBS entertainment (home to Stephen Colbert) and Comedy Central (home to Jon Stewart) and HBO (John Oliver) and TikTok (where [1 out of 5](https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/09/25/1-in-5-americans-now-regularly-get-news-on-tiktok-up-sharply-from-2020/) Americans now get their news) — are *all* about to become one giant mega-media monopoly under the control of Trump allies and suck-ups: multibillionaire Larry Ellison and Ellison’s son, David. **It’s not too late to stop this, and I’ll tell you how in a moment, but I’d like you to pause and imagine how readily this new pro-Trump media giant can mislead America about what Trump is doing and silence criticism of Trump.** It could make Rupert Murdoch’s media empire of Fox News, *The Wall Street Journal*, and the *New York Post* look scrupulous by comparison. Trump cares more about TV news than he does about his presidency. In fact, TV news *is* his presidency. He chose his Cabinet members on the basis of their total loyalty to him and how they look and sound on TV. He spends all day watching coverage of himself on TV. And now he’s on the verge of having effective control over a gigantic media monopoly. I don’t believe Jon Stewart or John Oliver will be silenced, but their contracts may not be renewed. After all, look at what CBS did to Stephen Colbert, whose show will end in May. I wouldn’t be surprised if the algorithm on TikTok is adjusted to reduce Trump criticism. And a small army of producers and correspondents at CNN are likely to be more careful about what they report. Stories critical of Trump may be axed, as is now occurring at the late, great CBS News. How did this happen? Think greed, money, power, and Trump. [](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!-DlM!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F08993853-ce46-41dd-9a2f-ea2ad11f1ee9_1200x675.webp) Trump and his media head, Larry Ellison #### **Trump and the Ellisons take over Warner Bros. Discovery** When the dark history of this sordid era is written, among the most shameful culprits — who put making humongous amounts of money for themselves above the common good — will be Larry and David Ellison; Shari Redstone, former owner of Paramount; and David Zaslav, the current CEO of Warner Bros. Discovery. Zaslav is now being lauded by the business community as a genius for selling Warner Bros. Discovery (in turn the owner of CNN, CNN International, and HBO) to the Ellisons’ for $111 billion, more than double its valuation in September. But he’s couldn’t give a rat’s ass about the common good. (Zaslav filed to sell just over [$114 million](https://variety.com/2026/tv/news/david-zaslav-selling-114-million-warner-bros-discovery-stock-1236678807/) worth of Warner Bros. stock less than a week after Warner Bros. clinched the deal.) Why would the Ellisons spend billions (and go deep into debt) to buy Warner Bros. Discovery? Wealth and power — along with additional wealth and power that Trump can deliver. Larry Ellison is
View originalBlink’s budget buzzer gets some worthwhile upgrades
 Blink launched the second generation of its video doorbell this week. Amazon’s budget security camera company, Blink, has launched the second generation of its [popular video doorbell](https://www.theverge.com/2021/9/28/22698612/amazon-blink-video-doorbell-outdoor-camera-floodlight-solar-panel). The [new Blink Video Doorbell](https://www.amazon.com/BlinkDoorbell) adds a head-to-toe view and improved video resolution. It can also now alert you when a person is at your door instead of just the neighborhood cat or a strong gust of wind triggering its motion sensors. The doorbell camera comes with a new, more basic hub, the Sync Module Core, which, unlike the first-gen model, is required to use the buzzer. Blink’s latest doorbell is still one of the cheapest on the market, costing $59.99 without the hub and $69.99 with it. The lowest-priced [battery-powered buzzer](https://ring.com/products/battery-doorbell) from Ring, [Blink’s sister brand](https://www.theverge.com/22704290/amazon-blink-ring-camera-doorbell-brands-smart-home-why), is $99, and it only claims six to 12 months of battery life compared to Blink’s industry-leading two years, powered by [its custom silicon](https://www.theverge.com/24100149/blink-mini-2-review#%3A%7E%3Atext=Blink%E2%80%99s+custom-built%2Ca+Blink+subscription.)).  Upgrades on this version include an improved 150-degree field of view with a 1:1 aspect ratio. That should give you a head-to-toe view of your porch so you can see people and packages. The prior version, which is my pick for the [best budget video doorbell](https://www.theverge.com/22954554/best-video-doorbell-camera?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22454846081&gbraid=0AAAAA9k5E7BvZfFmJHpRO277kAo86L34q#o7D9AX%3A%7E%3Atext=details+here.-%2CBest+budget+doorbell+camera%2C-Blink+Video+Doorbell), has a 16:9 aspect ratio. This buzzer also adds 1440p x 1440p image resolution, according to Jonathan Cohn, Blink’s head of product. This is a step up from 1080p, meaning footage should be clearer. There’s still no color night vision; it retains the infrared night vision of the first-gen model. The biggest upgrade is the addition of person detection; the first-gen model sends alerts for any motion, but now you can be notified just when there’s a person at your door. This is powered by [on-device computer vision](https://support.blinkforhome.com/en_US/using-your-camera/person-detection), so it doesn’t require the cloud. But it does require a $3 per month ($30 per year) [Blink subscription plan](https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08J5G9BCT?adgwdg=vicc_subscriptions_display_on_website&tenantId=DEVICE_SUBS&ASIN=B08JHCVHTY&nodl=12) (which also adds 60 days of cloud storage for recorded video). Blink has slowly been bringing person detection to its lineup, adding it first to its [wired floodlight camera](https://www.theverge.com/22811985/best-smart-floodlight-security-camera#%3A%7E%3Atext=and+professional+monitoring.-%2CThe+best+budget+floodlight+camera%2C-Blink+Wired+Floodlight), then its [flagship outdoor camera](https://www.theverge.com/2023/8/24/23843590/blink-outdoor-4-security-camera-wireless-person-detection), and its [Blink Mini indoor / outdoor camera](https://www.theverge.com/24100149/blink-mini-2-review) last year. The new doorbell requires a Sync Module to work, Cohn says, and it now comes with the new Sync Module Core, rather than the [Sync Module 2](https://www.amazon.com/Blink-Sync-Module-2/dp/B084RQ6MHJ). This is something of a downgrade as the Core doesn’t have the local storage option that the Sync 2 offers. Cohn says the module helps extend battery life and range and enables on-demand live view and two-way audio. He confirmed that the new doorbell can work with the Sync 2 and the newer long-range [Sync Module XR,](https://www.amazon.com/All-new-Blink-Sync-Module-XR/dp/B0B198XD6X) if you already have one or if you want local storage.  The new buzzer features a slightly chunkier design to accommodate three AA lithium batteries as opposed to two in the first-gen version. The extra battery helps maintain the impressive two-year battery life while powering improved image quality and the addition of person detection, Cohn says. Blink is unique among security camera makers as it uses its own chip that’s optimized for power management, so while it doesn’t boast the higher-end features like those from Ring and Arlo, you don’t have to worry about dealing with charging or replacing its batteries as often. It can also be hardwired to main power, which allows the
View originalMabl uses a subscription + tiered pricing model. Visit their website for current pricing details.
Key features include: 10x faster test creation, 85% reduction in test maintenance, 10x faster test runs, Testing AI: A New Frontier, Get E2E UI Test Coverage for Browser Apps, Easily Test iOS and Android Apps, Integrate End-to-End API Tests, Ensure Application Speed and Stability.
Weights & Biases Education
Platform at Weights & Biases
1 mention
