We believe our research will eventually lead to artificial general intelligence, a system that can solve human-level problems. Building safe and benef
Based on these social mentions, users are primarily discussing OpenAI's new pricing tiers, particularly the $200/month ChatGPT Pro plan featuring the o1 reasoning model. There's significant debate about whether the premium pricing is justified, with many users questioning the value proposition of paying $200 monthly compared to the $20 ChatGPT Plus subscription. The company continues to generate excitement with major funding rounds ($110B+) and technical advances like the o1 model, though users appear divided on whether the enhanced capabilities warrant the steep price increase. Overall sentiment suggests OpenAI maintains its position as an AI leader, but pricing concerns are becoming a notable point of user discussion.
Mentions (30d)
74
Reviews
0
Platforms
8
GitHub Stars
10,775
1,446 forks
Based on these social mentions, users are primarily discussing OpenAI's new pricing tiers, particularly the $200/month ChatGPT Pro plan featuring the o1 reasoning model. There's significant debate about whether the premium pricing is justified, with many users questioning the value proposition of paying $200 monthly compared to the $20 ChatGPT Plus subscription. The company continues to generate excitement with major funding rounds ($110B+) and technical advances like the o1 model, though users appear divided on whether the enhanced capabilities warrant the steep price increase. Overall sentiment suggests OpenAI maintains its position as an AI leader, but pricing concerns are becoming a notable point of user discussion.
Features
Industry
research
Employees
7,500
Funding Stage
Venture (Round not Specified)
Total Funding
$281.9B
116,683
GitHub followers
238
GitHub repos
10,775
GitHub stars
20
npm packages
40
HuggingFace models
15,196,394
npm downloads/wk
229,297,133
PyPI downloads/mo
OpenAI just released o1 and their new $200 / month ChatGPT Pro plan. It includes unlimited access to the o1 reasoning model, which is smarter, faster, and better at solving complex problems than ever
OpenAI just released o1 and their new $200 / month ChatGPT Pro plan. It includes unlimited access to the o1 reasoning model, which is smarter, faster, and better at solving complex problems than ever before. This model can even analyze images now, making it a powerhouse for tasks like coding, math, and science. Pro users also get an exclusive "o1 pro mode" that uses extra computing power for the hardest questions.It’s designed for researchers and professionals who need cutting-edge AI tools daily.This plan also bundles GPT-4o and Advanced Voice features for an all-in-one premium experience. While the price is steep, OpenAI says it’s aimed at those who need top-tier AI performance. For everyone else, o1 is still accessible on lower plans but with limitations.The launch also includes a grant program for medical researchers to use ChatGPT Pro for free.It’s a bold move from OpenAI as they push the boundaries of what AI can do.
View originalOpenAI, not yet public, raises $3B from retail investors in monster $122B fund raise
OpenAI's latest funding round, led by Amazon, Nvidia, and SoftBank, values the AI lab at $852 billion as it nears an IPO.
View originalOpenAI closes funding round at an $852B valuation
<a href="https://openai.com/index/accelerating-the-next-phase-ai" rel="nofollow">https://openai.com/index/accelerating-the-next-phase-ai</a>
View originalImagine if your Teams or Slack messages automatically turned into secure context for your AI agents — PromptQL built it
For the modern enterprise, the digital workspace risks descending into "coordination theater," in which teams spend more time discussing work than executing it. While traditional tools like Slack or Teams excel at rapid communication, they have structurally failed to serve as a reliable foundation for AI agents, such that a Hacker News thread went viral in February 2026 calling upon OpenAI to build its own version of Slack to help empower AI agents, amassing 327 comments. That's because agents often lack the real-time context and secure data access required to be truly useful, often resulting in "hallucinations" or repetitive re-explaining of codebase conventions. PromptQL, a spin-off from the GraphQL unicorn Hasura, is addressing this by pivoting from an AI data tool into a comprehensive, AI-native workspace designed to turn casual, regular team interactions into a persistent, secure memory for agentic workflows — ensuring these conversations are not simply left by the wayside or that users and agents have to try and find them again later, but rather, distilled and stored as actionable, proprietary data in an organized format — an internal wiki — that the company can rely on going forward, forever, approved and edited manually as needed. Imagine two colleagues messaging about a bug that needs to be fixed — instead of manually assigning it to an engineer or agent, your messaging platform automatically tags it, assigns it and documents it all in the wiki with one click Now do this for every issue or topic of discussion that takes place in your enterprise, and you'll have an idea of what PromptQL is attempting. The idea is a simple but powerful one: turning the conversation that necessarily precedes work into an actual assignment that is automatically started by your own messaging system. “We don’t have conversations about work anymore," CEO Tanmai Gopal said in a recent video call interview with VentureBeat. "You actually have conversations that do the work.” Origina
View originalMidjourney engineer debuts new vibe coded, open source standard Pretext to revolutionize web design
For three decades, the web has existed in a state of architectural denial. It is a platform originally conceived to share static physics papers, yet it is now tasked with rendering the most complex, interactive, and generative interfaces humanity has ever conceived. At the heart of this tension lies a single, invisible, and prohibitively expensive operation known as "layout reflow." Whenever a developer needs to know the height of a paragraph or the position of a line to build a modern interface, they must ask the browser’s Document Object Model (DOM), the standard by which developers can create and modify webpages. In response, the browser often has to recalculate the geometry of the entire page — a process akin to a city being forced to redraw its entire map every time a resident opens their front door. Last Friday, March 27, 2026, Cheng Lou — a prominent software engineer whose work on React, ReScript, and Midjourney has defined much of the modern frontend landscape — announced on the social network X that he had "crawled through depths of hell" to release an open source (MIT License) solution: Pretext, which he coded using AI vibe coding tools and models like OpenAI's Codex and Anthropic's Claude. It is a 15KB, zero-dependency TypeScript library that allows for multiline text measurement and layout entirely in "userland," bypassing the DOM and its performance bottlenecks. Without getting too technical, in short, Lou's Pretext turns text blocks on the web into fully dynamic, interactive and responsive spaces, able to adapt and smoothly move around any other object on a webpage, preserving letter order and spaces between words and lines, even when a user clicks and drags other objects to intersect with the text, or resizes their browser window dramatically. Ironically, it's difficult with mere text alone to convey how significant Lou's latest release is for the entire web going forward. Fortunately, other third-party developers whipped up quick demos with Pretext
View originalMicrosoft’s Copilot makes Anthropic’s Claude and OpenAI’s GPT team up
Microsoft’s AI strategy has, for the most part, been about using third-party large language models (LLMs). First this was mostly The post Microsoft’s Copilot makes Anthropic’s Claude and OpenAI’s GPT team up appeared first on The New Stack.
View originalWhy OpenAI really shut down Sora
OpenAI's decision last week to shut down Sora, its AI video-generation tool, just six months after releasing it to the public, raised immediate suspicions. The app had invited users to upload their own faces — so was this some kind of elaborate data grab?
View originalI built an AI that has zero content filters — ask it literally anything
Hey everyone, I built an AI assistant with no content restrictions. It's free to try (5 tokens to start). Link: https://fraudgptt.lovable.app/ Would love your feedback. AMA in the comments
View originalI built an AI that has zero content filters — ask it literally anything
Hey everyone, I built an AI assistant with no content restrictions. It's free to try (5 tokens to start). Link: https://fraudgptt.lovable.app/ Would love your feedback. AMA in the comments
View originalAI Browser Game Jam 2
Everyone who makes AI games is welcome to join the 2nd AI Browser Game Jam! I started this jam because most game jams don't want you using AI, and the few AI jams that exist are usually sponsored by one specific tool and want you to use that. This one is completely open. Use whatever AI you want for whatever you want. Code, art, music, all of it, go wild. Only rule is your game has to be free and playable in the browser. This is to make it easier for everyone to play and rate the games. The first jam had about 50 people join and 29 actual submissions. If you've run jams you know that ratio is kind of insane. 20% is considered good, we hit over 50%. The games ranged from weird to genuinely impressive. [You can check them all out here.](https://itch.io/jam/ai-browser-game-jam/results) Format is 2 weeks to build followed by 1 week of voting. Last time I played every single game and left feedback on all of them. Planning to do the same this time. It's a chill jam. No drama about AI, no gatekeeping, just make something and share it. If you want to talk about your process and what tools you used that's great but not required. The theme will be announced when the jam starts. We can't wait to see what you make!
View originalRetry descriptive/concise missing?
Hey, so I didn't use GPT for a few weeks, then came back. When I was holding my thumb on retry, I would get an option to make the next response more descriptive or more concise. Where did that option go? It’s not working anymore.
View originalShould you deny or explain that you used AI?
Has anyone ever been questioned by your professor so many students are saying don’t say that you have used it. I want to be clear and honest but I’m reading that’s where « they » get you. Also to edit: Additionally, I uploaded the wrong paper. This paper was flagged for AI. It wasn’t intentional.
View originalAI poste filter
Hi everyone! I am someone that is worried of AI in général, but more so in entertainment. More and more AI slope is filling our feeds on social media, and it's learning from us, not only how to be more entertaining, but more importantly, how to be more addictive and irresistible!!!! And here's where I need your help: I need people like minded to work with me on pressuring social media companies to implement an AI filter, that can be toggled on, to remove AI content from the user's feed, whether it be AI slop, AI generated articles, AI songs......everything generated by AI, I want filtered out of my feed. Of course such filter can never be perfect, but it's better than nothing, and I speak from personal experience: my attention span and focus have been destroyed by social media consumption, and I'm truly scared of what a tailor made feed could do to me......and others that are with me in the same boat. I think that such an AI filter is not too much to ask, and not that hard to implement, but they'd never do it without proper motivation, so let's motivate them!!! I'm open to ideas
View originalDo you still like ChatGPT?
Do you still like ChatGPT? [View Poll](https://www.reddit.com/poll/1s1t1wr)
View originalI built a CLI to test product ideas with AI personas to validate your feature/product
Built a CLI to sanity-check product ideas before wasting weeks building them. I kept shipping features nobody used. Interviews help, but they’re slow. By the time you validate, you’ve already sunk days into the wrong thing. So I built CrowdMind. What it does: * pulls complaints from Reddit / HN / GitHub * turns them into feature ideas * tests them with simulated personas (skeptics, power users, etc.) Example: crowdmind validate "AI-powered semantic search" → 54/100 → "Most users just want faster Cmd+F" How I used Claude: * designed the persona system (what types, how they behave) * iterated on prompt structures for consistent scoring + feedback * generated evaluation rubrics (interest, usefulness, willingness to pay) * helped refine CLI UX + output formatting Claude was especially useful for: * making persona outputs less generic * stress-testing edge cases in idea evaluation It’s not ground truth (AI ≠ users), but it catches obvious bad ideas early. Think of it as spell-check for product bets. Free & open source: [https://github.com/yasintoy/crowdmind](https://github.com/yasintoy/crowdmind) pip install crowdmind Curious where you think this breaks and waiting your support on github
View originalOpenAI needs to make money. Meet Fidji Simo, the 'founder-mode' executive charged with making it happen.
OpenAI needs to make money. Meet Fidji Simo, the 'founder-mode' executive charged with making it happen.
View originalRepository Audit Available
Deep analysis of openai/openai-node — architecture, costs, security, dependencies & more
Yes, OpenAI offers a free tier. The pricing model is subscription + freemium + per-seat + tiered.
Key features include: Knowledge cut-off: Aug 31, 2025, GPT-5.4, GPT-5.4 mini, GPT-5.4 nano, Start working with GPT‑5, Prompting guidance, Front-end coding examples, Migration support.
OpenAI has a public GitHub repository with 10,775 stars.
Based on user reviews and social mentions, the most common pain points are: openai, cost tracking, claude, token usage.
Based on 129 social mentions analyzed, 0% of sentiment is positive, 100% neutral, and 0% negative.
Jiahui Yu
Research Lead at Google DeepMind (Imagen)
3 mentions