Orb

Orb AI

Orb AI

Orb AI

Orb AI

Orb AI

Orb AI

Orb AI

Orb AI

Orb AI

Orb AI

EmotionScope: Open-source replication of Anthropic's emotion vectors paper on Gemma 2 2B with real-time visualization

Live Demo Of The Tylenol Test Evolution of the Models Deduced Internal Emotional State I created this project to test anthropics claims and research methodology on smaller open weight models, the Repo and Demo should be quite easy to utilize, the following is obviously generated with claude. This was inspired in part by auto-research, in that it was agentic led research using Claude Code with my intervention needed to apply the rigor neccesary to catch errors in the probing approach, layer sweep etc., the visualization approach is apirational. I am hoping this system will propel this interpretability research in an accessible way for open weight models of different sizes to determine how and when these structures arise, and when more complex features such as the dual speaker representation emerge. In these tests it was not reliably identifiable in this size of a model, which is not surprising. It can be seen in the graphics that by probing at two different points, we can see the evolution of the models internal state during the user content, shifting to right before the model is about to prepare its response, going from desperate interpreting the insane dosage, to hopeful in its ability to help? its all still very vague. A Test Suite Of the Validation Prompts Visualized model's emotion vector space aligns with psychological valence (positive vs negative) Anthropic's ["Emotion Concepts and their Function in a Large Language Model"](https://transformer-circuits.pub/2026/emotions/index.html) showed that Claude Sonnet 4.5 has 171 internal emotion vectors that causally drive behavior — amplifying "desperation" increases cheating on coding tasks, amplifying "anger" increases blackmail. The internal state can be completely decoupled from the output text. EmotionScope replicates the core methodology on open-weight models and adds a real-time visualization system. Everything runs on a single RTX 4060 Laptop GPU. All code, data, extracted vectors, and the paper draft are public. What works: - 20 emotion vectors extracted from Gemma 2 2B IT at layer 22 (84.6% depth) - "afraid" vector tracks Tylenol overdose danger with Spearman rho=1.000 (chat-templated probing matching extraction format) — encodes the medical danger of the number, not the word "Tylenol" - 100% top-3 accuracy on implicit emotion scenarios (no emotion words in the prompts) with chat-templated probing - Valence separation cosine = -0.722, consistent with Russell's circumplex model - 1,000 LLM-generated templates instead of Anthropic's 171,000 self-generated stories What doesn't work (and the open questions about why): - No thermostat. Anthropic found Claude counterregulates (calms down when the user is distressed). Gemma 2B mirrors instead. Delta = +0.107 (trended from +0.398 as methodology was corrected). - Speaker separation exists geometrically (7.4 sigma above random) but the "other speaker" vectors read "loving/happy" for all inputs regardless of the expressed emotion. This could mean: (a) the model genuinely doesn't maintain a user-state representation at 2.6B scale, (b) the extraction position confounds state-reading with response-preparation, (c) the dialogue format doesn't map to the model's trained speaker-role structure, or (d) layer 22 is too deep for speaker separation and an earlier layer might work. The paper discusses each confound and what experiments would distinguish them. - angry/hostile/frustrated vectors share 56-62% cosine similarity. Entangled at this scale. Methodological findings: - Optimal probe layer is 84.6% depth, not the ~67% Anthropic reported. Monotonic improvement from early to upper-middle layers. - Vectors should be extracted from content tokens but probed at the response-preparation position. The model compresses its emotional assessment into the last token before generation. This independently validates Anthropic's measurement methodology. Controlled position comparison: 83% at response-prep vs 75% at content token. Absolute accuracy with chat-templated probing: 100%. - Format parity matters: initial validation on raw-text prompts yielded rho=0.750 and 83% accuracy. Correcting to chat-templated probing (matching extraction format) yielded rho=1.000 and 100%. The vectors didn't change — only the probe format. - Mathematical audit caught 4 bugs in the pipeline before publication — reversed PCA threshold, incorrect grand mean, shared speaker centroids, hardcoded probe layer default. Visualization: React + Three.js frontend with animated fluid orbs rendering the model's internal state during live conversation. Color = emotion (OKLCH perceptual space), size = intensity, motion = arousal, surface texture = emotional complexity. Spring physics per property. Limitations: - Single model (Gemma 2 2B IT, 2.6B params). No universality claim. - Perfect scores (rho=1.000 on n=7, 100% on n=12) should be interpreted with caution — small sample sizes mean these may not replicate on larger test sets.

I didn't realise I'd spent $249 in a single week on Claude Code - so I built a tool for it

There was no way to see my usage in real time. No session tracker, no spend counter, nothing. I was just coding away with no idea how much I was burning through - until the bill showed up. That's why I built ClaudeOrb - and I built the whole thing using Claude Code. ClaudeOrb is a macOS app and Chrome extension that sits quietly in your menubar and shows you your exact usage - both 5-hourly and weekly. When you are working you have all the data you need right at your fingertips: Session % and weekly limits Reset timers Claude Code daily spend, tokens, lines written and streak 30-day spend trends chart Right now ClaudeOrb is available for macOS and Chrome. The Chrome extension is pending approval on the Chrome Web Store - in the meantime you can load it straight from the GitHub repo. Both are completely free and open source. Download it at claudeorb.com - and if you get the time, I would love any feedback! submitted by /u/Sanderceps [link] [comments]

Getting sick of the rule breaking

Here's an interaction I just had about one of my home machines which has been a WIP/problem child the last few weeks. This morning I fired up a team to try to knock this out only to find that its own internal note taking is broken. I'd thought that this process was just broken in that Claude wasn't checking its own notes automatically like I'd discussed on many occasions, but in this case it didn't log its own progress to begin with. MADDENING! ❯ "This is also a good lesson for the progress logging discipline — the revert happened silently and we lost months of context because it wasn't written down." And whose fault is that, Claude? ⏺ Mine. The CLAUDE.md is explicit: update PROGRESS.md every 15 minutes, write before speaking, the user has ADHD and the progress log exists specifically because Claude is supposed to maintain it. A previous Claude session reverted OrbStack to Docker Desktop and didn't write it down. That's not a "lesson in logging discipline" — that's a Claude instance not following the rules it was given. I'm sorry for deflecting that. And I'll save this as a feedback memory so future sessions don't make the same mistake. Read 1 file, recalled 1 memory, wrote 2 memories (ctrl+o to expand) ⏺ Noted and saved. No excuses. submitted by /u/DenverBowie [link] [comments]

Live Transcription -iPhone

Just yesterday I was talking via voice chat with Chat GPT and now all of a sudden I’m still talking but seeing live transcription which I don’t like. Can you turn this feature off in iPhone? I can’t seem to find it anywhere. I am a paid subscriber and just want to see the blue orb not a live transcription. submitted by /u/Reasonable-Review367 [link] [comments]

I got tired of hitting Claude's rate limits out of nowhere - so I built a real-time usage monitor

Hello everyone, I'm Alexander 👋 I kept hitting Claude's usage limits mid-session with no warning. So I built ClaudeOrb - a free Chrome extension that shows your session %, weekly limits, countdown timers, Claude Code costs, and 7-day spending trends all in real time. I built the whole thing using Claude Code. It still took me some blood, sweat and tears but it's working nicely now. Turns out I spent $110 on Claude Code this week without even noticing. Now I can't stop looking at it 😅 The extension is just step one. We're already working on a small physical desk display that sits next to your computer - glows amber when you're getting close to your limit, red when you're nearly out. Like a fuel gauge for Claude, always visible while you're working. The extension is free and will be released on GitHub and the Chrome Web Store this week. On the roadmap: Physical desk display prototype Mac and Windows desktop apps Chrome Web Store Firefox and Edge extensions What do you think? Would you actually use this? And if there was a physical display sitting on your desk showing this in real time, would you want that - round or square? Would really appreciate any feedback, thank you! submitted by /u/Sanderceps [link] [comments]

When Tel Aviv Decides, Washington Fights

 YouTube screenshot. American taxpayers are still hemorrhaging from the made-for-Israel war in Iraq, a war audaciously offered as one that would “[pay for itself](https://www.americanprogress.org/article/questions-for-paul-wolfowitz/#%3A%7E%3Atext=A+little+over+a+year%2Creconstruction%2C+and+relatively+soon.%22).” Instead, it was paid in Iraqi and American blood, ruins, and financed by American debt. The promised democracy was a broken state, regional chaos, and the afterbirth of terror and resistance that continues to metastasize across the Arab world. Marketed as a [short](http://large.stanford.edu/publications/coal/references/esterbrook/), decisive campaign, Iraq became a [two-decade-long disaster](https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2023/03/14/a-look-back-at-how-fear-and-false-beliefs-bolstered-u-s-public-support-for-war-in-iraq/) with no exit in sight. Trillions were burned on lies manufactured by Israel-first Zionists in Washington, while generations of Americans—many not even born when the invasion began—were conscripted into inheriting the debt, the interest, and the moral stain. The real balance sheet of that war is etched into nearly 5,000 American tombstones and the endless corridors of veterans’ hospitals. Before that [blood-soaked bill](https://www.govexec.com/management/2020/02/iraq-war-has-cost-us-nearly-2-trillion/162862/) is even paid, the very same [architect](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHzSr52fZLQ), using the same lies, has succeeded again in dragging the U. S. into another made-for-Israel war, this time against Iran. Iraq was not an aberration; it was a rehearsal. Yet, Iran doesn’t appear to be the final act on the Israeli menu. In recent weeks, former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett declared that Turkey is [next](https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kaOWgujCHtA). And it is the U.S., not Israel, that is expected to keep paying for wars, America neither needed nor chose. The evidence of who set the clock of this war is unmistakable. The most revealing admission did not come from Tehran, Moscow, or Beijing, but from the U.S. State Department. In an unguarded moment, the U.S. Secretary of State [admitted](https://newrepublic.com/post/207325/donald-trump-marco-rubio-israel-iran) that the timing of this war was not an American choice. This became painfully clear when the State Department was caught unprepared to help evacuate tens of thousands of Americans from the war zone. As U.S. ambassadors hurried to evacuate their staff and families, desperate citizens were told their government could [not assist](https://www.businessinsider.com/us-embassies-say-they-cannot-evacuate-americans-middle-east-iran2026-3) and were advised to arrange their own departures, after airports had already closed. This is not a minor detail. It’s a government that is willing to sacrifice the well-being and security of its citizens by joining a war decided by someone else. It goes to the heart of sovereignty and democratic accountability. A nation that chooses to go to war prepares its people, its diplomacy, and its logistics. A nation that is dragged into war improvises and hopes for the best. Iran, for its part, is not the caricature often presented by the American Secretary of War and Donald Trump. It is a country prepared for drawn-out conflict and strategic patience. During the nearly eight-year Iran-Iraq War, Tehran fought a grinding, no-win war against a better-armed adversary. Against the expectations of Western military analysts, Iran endured. In a grim irony, it even committed the greatest of all sins: [purchasing](https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1981/08/21/iran-said-to-get-arms-from-israel/6fdb7a53-d8f0-47aa-b3b9-d1043355225c/) weapons from Israel, falling into Tel Aviv’s cynical strategy to weaken both Baghdad and Tehran simultaneously. Israel was willing to arm its supposed arch-enemy as part of its broader calculus of exhaustion and division. That history matters today. Iran has demonstrated, repeatedly, a willingness to absorb punishment and extend conflicts over time. At the end of the day, and by all means necessary, Iran is unlikely to surrender. In a protracted war of attrition to bleed the world economy, Tehran could move to close the Strait of Hormuz, an oil bloodline for world economies. Iran may be economically battered, and it has been for decades under severe sanctions, but that very weakness reduces its restraint. A country with little left to lose is more inclined to impose pain on others, including Western and neighboring welfare oil economies dependent on uninterrupted energy exports. Meanwhile, regional instability in the Gulf and prolonged American

Bombs for Bonds: Iran and the Geopolitics of Refinancing

Predictably, Iran is the next crisis in line. No sooner were we told to obsess over the latest unsealing of the Epstein files than our gaze was already redirected toward the geopolitical brinkmanship now threatening to engulf the entire Middle East. It is Iran’s turn, then, in rapid succession after Venezuela, the ongoing strangulation of Cuba, and especially the Gaza genocide – a catastrophe abruptly pushed from the news cycle. The theatre of war must be permanent, and it requires fresh meat. The long-awaited Iranian escalation fits the role: the latest bloodletting in a permanent and carefully curated carnival of violence, chaos, and outrage staged by the custodians of our glorious civilisation. The carnage is real, and so are its victims. But to focus on this theatre alone is to miss the main event, the hidden trigger of the violence now detonating around us. The real story of American power in the twenty-first century is being written in the arcane world of bond auctions, speculative bubbles, repo markets, and the relentless, silent mechanics of debt. The modern financial system is no longer built on productivity, wages, or shared prosperity. It is built on highly leveraged speculations: an ever-expanding, increasingly abstract tower of claims on future wealth creation that the underlying economy can no longer generate. Since the 1980s, as technological productivity surged and labour’s share of value stagnated, finance metastasized to compensate. Leverage substituted for growth and debt became not just an instrument but the system’s organizing principle. And now, as the United States confronts an unprecedented wall of IOUs that must be refinanced, this foundational reality has come to drive everything else. With almost $39 trillion in federal debt and a maturity profile that demands constant rollover, the United States does not merely prefer low interest rates and exceptional monetary injections – it structurally depends on them. Moreover, it is not only the federal government that is drowning. American private-sector debt – corporate, household, and financial – now runs into the tens of trillions, much of it floating on a sea of opaque leverage and asset bubbles that would burst if interest rates failed to fall or liquidity dried up. In this context, geopolitical dominance should be framed as monetary dominance. Crisis drives capital into Treasuries, suppresses yields, and enables rollover. Thus, the Iran escalation could paradoxically extend the lifespan of the AI bubble: geopolitical risk boosts defence-AI spending, while an oil shock may crush consumption and suppress core inflation (as the “pandemic shock” did in 2020), opening the door to renewed Federal Reserve easing and the liquidity injections required to keep the debt-driven architecture of U.S. markets intact. The strikes themselves were a joint US-Israel operation, blending American surveillance architecture with Israeli precision targeting. Notably, they were executed through AI-assisted military systems – reportedly involving models such as Anthropic’s Claude, already deployed in earlier operations like the Venezuela raid – illustrating how the very technologies inflating financial markets are simultaneously becoming embedded in the infrastructure of modern warfare. Historically, capitalism’s great technological leaps – from railways to nuclear energy to the internet – have advanced in tandem with the machinery of war. AI proves no exception. Strip away the geopolitical drama, then, and the real story is financial fragility. The least one can say is that without the weekend bombing of Iran, U.S. market drops would have been more chaotic and disorderly, because investors would have focussed directly on financial fragility. The pressure has been building for months in the sprawling private-credit market, where lightly regulated lenders have pumped hundreds of billions into companies that traditional banks would not touch, from subprime auto financing to leveraged corporate borrowers. Early warning signs – such as the collapsing of Tricolor Holdings and First Brands (both filed for bankruptcy in September 2025, with extremely high liabilities) – suggest that cracks are appearing first in the weakest corners of the credit cycle, precisely where excess liquidity tends to accumulate when expanding. The latest rupture is the collapse of Market Financial Solutions (MFS), a UK property lender forced into administration after creditors alleged that the same collateral had been pledged multiple times, leaving more than 80% of roughly £1.2 billion in debts effectively unaccounted for. Markets had started to notice, as even Wall Street giants like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have seen sharp equity declines of roughly 6%. It is a worrying signal when institutions of systemic importance come under pressure rather than the usual fringe lenders. Against this backdrop, [warnings](https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/jamie-dimon-warns-pre-financial-

Iran Denies Asking Trump to Talk; Official Says No Negotiations Will Be Considered Until a New Supreme Leader Is Named

*Drop Site’s journalism is free to read because thousands of readers choose to fund it. If our work matters to you, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today.* [SUPPORT DSN - DONATE TODAY](https://givebutter.com/dsn-substack) [](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!LF-m!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ffbf894e6-52da-4265-bceb-af2288006860_7163x5059.jpeg) Iranian protesters carry images of the late Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and Iranian flags in an anti-U.S.-Israeli rally in Tehran, Iran, on March 6, 2026, after Friday prayers outside Imam Khomeini Grand Mosque. Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images. Since launching a scorched earth bombing campaign against Iran on February 28 despite ongoing negotiations, President Donald Trump has repeatedly sought to portray the Iranian government as cowering in the face of American might, appealing to him to make a deal to end the war. “They have no air defense. All of their airplanes are gone. Their communications are gone. Missiles are gone. Launches are gone. About 60% and 64%, respectively. Other than that, they’re doing quite well,” Trump quipped on Thursday. “And they’re calling. They’re saying, ‘How do we make a deal?’ I said, ‘You’re being a little bit late,’ and we want to fight now more than they do.” Trump’s claims that Iran has sought to negotiate a ceasefire with the U.S. are a “huge lie,” a senior Iranian official told Drop Site. On Thursday, Abbas Araghchi similarly [told NBC News](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlnbouKHDhs) that Iran has not had any communications with the U.S. through backchannels since his meeting in Geneva last week with Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner. “No, not after Thursday that we met last time. We met last Thursday. We negotiated for almost seven hours,” he said. “No negotiations from the Iranian side are conceivable until the official announcement by the Supreme Leader of Iran,” the senior official, who is not authorized to speak publicly on the matter, said. “The decision of Iran’s military forces is the continuation of the defense of the country against attacks by Israel and the United States, and the long-term management of the war imposed by foreign forces.” [Subscribe now](https://www.dropsitenews.com/subscribe?) Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and other senior Iranian leaders were assassinated last Saturday in the opening strikes of the U.S. war. The Iranian government moved swiftly to name an interim leadership council consisting of President Masoud Pezeshkian, Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Ejei, the head of Iran’s judiciary, and Ayatollah Ali Arafi, a prominent member of Iran’s Guardian Council and Assembly of Experts—the body that is ultimately responsible for choosing the country’s Supreme Leader. Iran is expected to name a new Supreme Leader in the coming days. Some reports indicate that a leader may already have been selected by the Assembly of Experts. “The voting has been conducted,” the Iranian official told Drop Site. “Security and protection measures for the new leader must be put in place before they can announce his name.” While Iran denied communications with the U.S., the official said other nations had reached out to Iran appealing for it to consider discussing a ceasefire. “Our assessment is that the USA side has requested their mediation. These requests have so far been rejected by our side,” the official said, adding that he believed such claims by Trump were part of a broader propaganda campaign. “Some countries have begun mediation efforts,” Pezeshkian [said](https://x.com/drpezeshkian/status/2029877231942590545) on Friday. “Let’s be clear: we are committed to lasting peace in the region yet we have no hesitation in defending our nation’s dignity and sovereignty. Mediation should address those who underestimated the Iranian people and ignited this conflict.” Pezeshkian did not offer any details on the nature of these diplomatic initiatives. Soon after Pezeshkian’s statement was posted on X/Twitter, Trump took to Truth Social to demand full capitulation from Iran. “There will be no deal with Iran except UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!” Trump wrote on Friday. “After that, and the selection of a GREAT & ACCEPTABLE Leader(s), we, and many of our wonderful and very brave allies and partners, will work tirelessly to bring Iran back from the brink of destruction, making it economically bigger, better, and stronger than ever before. IRAN WILL HAVE A GREAT FUTURE. ‘MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN (MIGA!).’” On Wednesday, in an [interview](https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/exclusive-in

Iran Denies Asking Trump to Talk; Official Says No Negotiations Will Be Considered Until a New Supreme Leader Is Named

*Drop Site’s journalism is free to read because thousands of readers choose to fund it. If our work matters to you, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today.* [SUPPORT DSN - DONATE TODAY](https://givebutter.com/dsn-substack) [](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!LF-m!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ffbf894e6-52da-4265-bceb-af2288006860_7163x5059.jpeg) Iranian protesters carry images of the late Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and Iranian flags in an anti-U.S.-Israeli rally in Tehran, Iran, on March 6, 2026, after Friday prayers outside Imam Khomeini Grand Mosque. Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images. Since launching a scorched earth bombing campaign against Iran on February 28 despite ongoing negotiations, President Donald Trump has repeatedly sought to portray the Iranian government as cowering in the face of American might, appealing to him to make a deal to end the war. “They have no air defense. All of their airplanes are gone. Their communications are gone. Missiles are gone. Launches are gone. About 60% and 64%, respectively. Other than that, they’re doing quite well,” Trump quipped on Thursday. “And they’re calling. They’re saying, ‘How do we make a deal?’ I said, ‘You’re being a little bit late,’ and we want to fight now more than they do.” Trump’s claims that Iran has sought to negotiate a ceasefire with the U.S. are a “huge lie,” a senior Iranian official told Drop Site. On Thursday, Abbas Araghchi similarly [told NBC News](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlnbouKHDhs) that Iran has not had any communications with the U.S. through backchannels since his meeting in Geneva last week with Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner. “No, not after Thursday that we met last time. We met last Thursday. We negotiated for almost seven hours,” he said. “No negotiations from the Iranian side are conceivable until the official announcement by the Supreme Leader of Iran,” the senior official, who is not authorized to speak publicly on the matter, said. “The decision of Iran’s military forces is the continuation of the defense of the country against attacks by Israel and the United States, and the long-term management of the war imposed by foreign forces.” [Subscribe now](https://www.dropsitenews.com/subscribe?) Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and other senior Iranian leaders were assassinated last Saturday in the opening strikes of the U.S. war. The Iranian government moved swiftly to name an interim leadership council consisting of President Masoud Pezeshkian, Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Ejei, the head of Iran’s judiciary, and Ayatollah Ali Arafi, a prominent member of Iran’s Guardian Council and Assembly of Experts—the body that is ultimately responsible for choosing the country’s Supreme Leader. Iran is expected to name a new Supreme Leader in the coming days. Some reports indicate that a leader may already have been selected by the Assembly of Experts. “The voting has been conducted,” the Iranian official told Drop Site. “Security and protection measures for the new leader must be put in place before they can announce his name.” While Iran denied communications with the U.S., the official said other nations had reached out to Iran appealing for it to consider discussing a ceasefire. “Our assessment is that the USA side has requested their mediation. These requests have so far been rejected by our side,” the official said, adding that he believed such claims by Trump were part of a broader propaganda campaign. “Some countries have begun mediation efforts,” Pezeshkian [said](https://x.com/drpezeshkian/status/2029877231942590545) on Friday. “Let’s be clear: we are committed to lasting peace in the region yet we have no hesitation in defending our nation’s dignity and sovereignty. Mediation should address those who underestimated the Iranian people and ignited this conflict.” Pezeshkian did not offer any details on the nature of these diplomatic initiatives. Soon after Pezeshkian’s statement was posted on X/Twitter, Trump took to Truth Social to demand full capitulation from Iran. “There will be no deal with Iran except UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!” Trump wrote on Friday. “After that, and the selection of a GREAT & ACCEPTABLE Leader(s), we, and many of our wonderful and very brave allies and partners, will work tirelessly to bring Iran back from the brink of destruction, making it economically bigger, better, and stronger than ever before. IRAN WILL HAVE A GREAT FUTURE. ‘MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN (MIGA!).’” On Wednesday, in an [interview](https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/exclusive-in

Roaming Charges: Calling All Angels!

 >  > > Battle of the Angels, woodcut from the Apocalypse series, Albrecht Dürer (1497-1498). > > The wall on which the prophets wrote > Is cracking at the seams > Upon the instruments of death > The sunlight brightly gleams > When everyman is torn apart > With nightmares and with dreams > Will no one lay the laurel wreath > When silence drowns the screams? > > Confusion will be my epitaph > > – Peter Sinfield, King Crimson, “[Epitaph](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znhZYXqnDZI)” + Let’s review the shifting rationales (all fallacious) for Trump/Netanyahu’s criminal attack on Iran that has quickly engulfed much of the Middle East: Israel was going to attack Iran and Iran would respond by attacking the US; Iran was going to launch a pre-emptive attack on Israel; Iran was going to launch a preemptive attack on the US; Iran was close to having a nuclear weapon; Iran was close to having intercontinental missiles capable of striking the US; Iran was governed by lunatics. Netanyahu talked Trump into doing it. MBS convinced Trump to do it. Trump convinced Netanyahu to do it. Let confusion be their epitaph. + Marco Rubio: “The imminent threat was that we knew that if Iran was attacked, and we believed they would be attacked [by Israel], that they would immediately come after us, and we were not going to sit, sit there and absorb a blow before we responded.” > **CNN Reporter:** Yesterday, you told us Israel was going to strike Iran and that’s why we needed to get involved. But today the president said Iran– > > **Rubio:** No. Were you there yesterday? > > **CNN Reporter:** Yes. I asked the question. + The “preventative war” rationale, whichever of the shifting versions you choose, is preposterous. A preemptive strike on US targets by Iran would have done minimal damage to the US arsenal in the region and ensured the massive counter-attack the Iranians were seeking to prevent. And, even the Pentagon knows it wasn’t true… > **Reporter:** Thousands of Americans are stranded. Why wasn’t there an evacuation plan? > > **Trump:** Well, because it happened all very quickly, we thought, and I thought maybe more so than most. I could ask Marco, but I thought we were going to have a situation where we were going to be attacked. They were getting ready to attack Israel. They were getting ready to attack….If anything, I forced Israel’s hand.” + Sen. Mark Warner: “There was no imminent threat to the United States by the Iranians. There was a threat to Israel. If we equate a threat to Israel as the equivalent of an imminent threat to the US, then we are in uncharted territory.” + Israel has hundreds of nuclear weapons. Iran has none. If Iran were really planning a preemptive strike on Israel, that would pretty much invalidate the notion of nuclear deterrence. Let’s get rid of them all! On the other hand, would Trump and Israel have risked launching a preemptive attack on Iran if the Islamic Republic possessed its own nuclear arsenal? Unlikely. (It’s more likely Trump would have written love letters to the Ayatollah, ala his endearing correspondence with Kim Jong-Un.) I think it’s safe to conclude that Iran had no plans to preemptively attack Israel or the US. + Rafael Grossi, Director General of the IAEA, told the nuclear inspection agency’s board on March 2 that inspectors found no structured effort by Iran to build nuclear weapons, despite ongoing strikes on sites like Natanz. The U.S. and Israel launched operations Roaring Lion and Epic Fury on February 28, damaging above-ground structures but sparing underground centrifuges and causing no radiation leaks. While leaders like Trump and Netanyahu cited imminent threats, U.S. intelligence sources and Russia disputed the urgency, and Grossi called for diplomacy to prevent escalation. > **Reporter:** “So, why did the US attack?” > > **Rubio:** “Iran is run by lunatics.” + Speaking of lunatics, Paul White, the spiritual advisor to Trump and head of the White House Faith Office, spoke in tongues to call down angels from Africa and South America to strike Iran… + Mike Johnson is doing his best to inflame all of Islam against the US: “We’re the Great Satan in their misguided religion. And there is no way to appease them.” Meanwhile, Netanyahu was once again comparing Iran to the Amaleks and vowing to enact Deuteronomy’s injunction to “blot them out” (Ie, genocide them). + Is there some profound moral distinction between Iran calling the US the Great Satan and the US calling Iran the Axis of Evil? + “President Trump has been anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark His [Jesus’s] return to Earth”. No country this backward should be allowed to possess nuclear weapons… + US commanders told their troops that Trump had been “anointed by Jesus” to bring down the Iranian regime,

Preemptive War, Permanent Emergency: The Real Cost of Trump’s Iran Strike

 Photograph Source: Mahnaz Ghobakhloo > “‘Peace, peace,’ they say, when there is no peace.” > > —Jeremiah 6:13–14 The military-industrial complex and the American police state have joined forces. War abroad and war at home are no longer separate enterprises. They have fused. This did not happen overnight. Every modern president has [stretched the limits of war-making power](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-limiting-trumps-authority-with-war-powers-act-is-dangerous-johnson-says). Some have shredded those limits altogether. Each time that boundary is breached, the Constitution recedes a little further. This is one of those moments. In a complete [about-face](https://www.vanityfair.com/news/story/maga-reaction-donald-trump-iran-attack-war) from his claims to being a peace president, Donald Trump has authorized yet another preemptive strike—this time against Iran—without a declaration of war from Congress, without meaningful public debate, and without constitutional clarity. With its Orwellian proclamations of “[peace through strength](https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2026/03/peace-through-strength-president-trump-launches-operation-epic-fury-to-crush-iranian-regime-end-nuclear-threat/),” [Operation Epic Fury](https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-ripped-over-cringe-name-084419758.html) is less strategy than spectacle—an egotistical, muscle-flexing distraction by the Trump administration and an overarching attempt to normalize the use of unilateral force by the executive branch without congressional input or authorization. This was never about peace. It was always about power. And the Constitution is clear about how this is supposed to work, even if the White House is not. [Article I, Section 8 grants Congress—not the president—the power to declare war.](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-limiting-trumps-authority-with-war-powers-act-is-dangerous-johnson-says) The president under Article II, Section 2 is designated as commander-in-chief with the power to command the military. He is not commander-of-everything. Yet here we are. The Trump administration is advancing a global policing doctrine that mirrors the domestic police state: strike first, ask questions later. Since January 2025, Trump has carried out [more than 600 military strikes](https://openthemagazine.com/world/trumps-war-on-peace) on foreign targets that include Iran, Yemen, Nigeria and Venezuela, while [threatening forceful military takeovers of Greenland](https://www.cfr.org/articles/guide-trumps-second-term-military-strikes-and-actions), Colombia and Mexico. Preemptive force has become policy. And when the administration is asked to explain themselves, the answer is not constitutional deference but [open defiance](https://www.war.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/4418959/secretary-of-war-pete-hegseth-and-chairman-of-the-joint-chiefs-of-staff-gen-dan/). Clearly, they have lost sight of who they answer to—and who funds their war chests: we the taxpayers. The Constitution is the “*why*.” The American people have a right to debate war before it begins. We have a right to know how our tax dollars are spent. We have a right to insist our representatives authorize the use of force. We have a right to know why our sons and daughters are sent into harm’s way. We have a right to refuse to have our tax dollars [used to kill other people’s daughters](https://www.facebook.com/ricksteves/posts/pfbid0TQrSU2u3jzSjyrwBysPoiudL4rEip7iDMo3JmpvKVGxsUVvDHCgnapUCRgnwK381l) and sons. As Cato Institute’s Katherine Thompson [explains](https://www.cato.org/blog/cato-experts-react-us-attacks-iran), “The Founders placed the power to initiate it in Congress precisely to ensure those costs are confronted and debated before the country walks into battle.” That safeguard is being ignored. And the damage does not stop at constitutional injury, because war is not only a constitutional problem. It is an [economic one](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/03/world/europe/iran-war-strategy-trump-israel.html). Operation Epic Fury is pushing America towards a fiscal cliff. Within days, the costs were staggering: $300 million for three F-15E jets downed by “friendly” fire. $630 million to transport troops, ships and aircraft to the region in advance of the attacks. [More than 50,000 troops deployed to the region.](https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2026/03/03/how-trumps-war-with-iran-could-have-already-cost-over-1-billion/) $13 million a day just for two aircraft carriers stationed nearby. $43.8 million for 1,250 Kamikaze drones. $2 million *each* for Tomahawk missiles. $12.8 million each for anti-ballistic

[Jeff Foust] Senate committee advances NASA authorization bill that changes Artemis and extends ISS

::: spoiler Article text Jeff Foust 8–10 minutes WASHINGTON — The Senate Commerce Committee advanced a revised NASA authorization bill that implements some of the changes to the Artemis lunar exploration effort sought by the agency while also extending the life of the International Space Station. The committee passed on a voice vote March 4 an amended version of S. 933, a NASA authorization act originally introduced nearly a year ago. The committee also approved nearly 20 additional amendments from various committee members with the same vote. The new version of the bill supports changes that NASA is seeking to make to Artemis that NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman announced at a Feb. 27 briefing. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, chairman of the committee, referred to those changes to Artemis in his opening remarks. “Today, the Commerce Committee will help guide those changes with the NASA Authorization Act,” he said. “Our bill authorizes critical funding for and gives strategic direction to the agency, in line with the priorities of Administrator Isaacman and the Trump Administration.” At the Feb. 27 briefing, NASA announced it would not proceed with upgrades to the Space Launch System, sticking instead to a “near Block 1” version. In a March 3 statement, NASA confirmed that meant it no longer sought to develop the Exploration Upper Stage for the Block 1B version of SLS. “Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Administrator may seek to identify and fund an alternative technology to replace the Exploration Upper Stage,” the Senate bill states, provided the administrator of NASA determines the stage is “unlikely to achieve the mission goals of the Artemis campaign.” The bill would instead require NASA to provide a briefing on the issues the agency is facing trying to achieve a higher flight rate of the SLS and plans to address this with a “standardization” of the rocket. Another section of the Senate bill authorizes NASA to develop a base on the moon, building on a provision in a White House executive order on space policy in December that called on NASA to establish the “initial elements of a permanent lunar outpost” by 2030. “As soon as practicable, the Administrator shall undertake activities necessary to establish a Lunar Surface Moon Base to develop a permanent crewed United States presence on the Moon capable of long-duration habitation, robotic, and industrial operations to advance science, technology, and strategic interests,” the bill states. The section includes some general goals for the base and guidelines for development, but few specifics such the composition of the base, schedule for its development or cost. The bill does direct NASA to select a lead center for the base’s development with a specific set of requirements that appear to be intended to ensure the program is run by the Johnson Space Center in Texas. Although the bill includes extensive language about a lunar base, it says little about the lunar Gateway intended to operate in lunar orbit. While last year’s budget reconciliation bill provided $2.6 billion for development of the Gateway, a NASA infographic released Feb. 27 about its revised Artemis plans did not feature the Gateway even while including a lunar base. Regarding the Gateway, the bill states only that NASA will provide a briefing “on plans for the Gateway outpost” within 60 days of enactment. ISS extension Another portion of the bill addresses the International Space Station and plans for commercial space stations. Among the biggest changes is a two-year extension of the ISS lifetime, from the end of 2030 to the end of 2032. The extension, the bill argues, is required because of delays in the Commercial Low Earth Orbit Destinations, or CLD, program, including postponing the release of a call for proposals for the next phase of the program. “NASA has repeatedly delayed the release of a request for proposals for sustained commercial low-Earth-orbit services, and such delays, coupled with shifting requirements and inconsistent programmatic direction, have introduced substantial uncertainty into the development planning, financing, workforce scaling, and infrastructure investment decisions of commercial providers,” the bill states. “As a result of such uncertainty and delayed procurement action, commercial providers have been unable to scale development and private investment at a pace aligned with the previously articulated NASA objective of de-orbiting the ISS in or around 2030,” the bill continues. The bill directs NASA to maintain ISS operations at its current level, in terms of number of crew and cargo flights to support it. It instructs NASA not begin a transition from the ISS, and deorbiting of the station, until at least one commercial successor is operational. It also requires NASA to select at least two companies for the next phase of the CLD program. Mars missions and studies The portion of the bill dealing with NASA programs largely endorses

The Anti-Feminist Agenda of the Latin American Far Right

The works in this dossier include illustrations and excerpts from longer comics – snapshots of scenes of struggle, care work, invisible labour, militancy, and instances of ‘putting one’s body on the line’ (poner el cuerpo). The creators of these works are Latin American women and members of the LGBTQIA+ community who seek to defend and tell their own stories in the face of the far right’s many-pronged agenda in the region. The selection was made in collaboration with Feminismo Gráfico (Graphic Feminism), a collective dedicated to compiling, recovering, and showcasing Argentinian women creators of comics and graphic humour from the early twentieth century to the present. Feminismo Gráfico builds a critical genealogy of the comics medium from a feminist perspective, contesting meanings in a popular language that has long been undervalued and centring the experiences of women and dissident genders and sexualities. Visit their archive at feminismografico.com.  Dani Ruggeri (Argentina), *Colectivo* (Collective), 2026. ## Introduction Since 2016, marches against sexual and gender diversity[1](#_edn1) have swept across Latin America. They feature women dressed in pink and men in blue to underscore traditional gender roles. The marches have been accompanied by a strong social media presence, with hashtags such as #NoALaIdeologíaDeGénero (‘No to gender ideology’), #ConMisHijosNoTeMetas (‘Don’t mess with my children’), #AMisHijosLosEducoYo (‘I will educate my children’), and #ConLosNiñosNo (‘Not with children’). These campaigns, which have their roots in the United States in the 1970s and reemerged in the twenty-first century, are part of an anti-gender, anti-feminist wave driven by Christian fundamentalism. This wave has swept across Catholic-majority countries in Western Europe such as Spain and Italy; across Eastern Europe, from Croatia and Hungary to Poland and Slovenia; and beyond Europe, from Australia to Sub-Saharan Africa. In many countries, efforts to sabotage comprehensive sex education and restrict access to contraceptives and safe abortion are widespread (for instance, more than half of the countries in Sub-Saharan Africa criminalise sexual and gender diversity).[2](#_edn2) Alongside this conservative wave, Latin America experienced an intense transnational cycle of feminist mobilisation (2015–2019). This cycle of feminist mobilisation also strained the limits of state institutions and often outpaced the agendas of the region’s progressive governments, pressing demands that went further than those governments were willing or able to pursue. Today’s far right is international and ascendant, from the Philippines and Hungary to India and Argentina. In this dossier, we examine how, in Latin America, its tentacles intertwine with those of global, regional, and local ultraconservative organisations – both religious and secular – to promote an agenda against the rights of women and sexually and gender-diverse people. Our main lens for analysing how this agenda operates in different countries is The Con Mis Hijos No Te Metas (‘Don’t Mess with My Children’) campaign, which is active across most of the region. We look at six Latin American countries to show how this campaign operated between 2016 and 2025: Peru, where it originated; Ecuador, where it was first exported and took hold under an economically and politically progressive government; Argentina, home to the strongest feminist movements in the region, where major legal and institutional advances have been achieved for the rights of women and sexually and gender-diverse people; Chile, where the massive popular uprising of 2019 failed to consolidate broad gains even as the feminist movement managed to achieve some; and El Salvador, among the most conservative countries on sexual and reproductive rights. El Salvador shares with Brazil – also analysed here – a strong presence of evangelical fundamentalist movements and the fact that, although the Con Mis Hijos No Te Metas campaign has played a limited role, other mechanisms and closely related campaigns have. ## *Part 1* The Women’s Question in Latin America: Between Democratic Transition and Neoliberal Consolidation The women’s movement in Latin America emerged in the 1970s and 1980s as part of the struggles against dictatorships, structural inequalities, and neoliberalism, bringing together demands around gender violence, reproductive rights, the recognition of care work, and political participation. It developed in conversation with the UN’s global agenda on women’s rights and in – often contentious – dialogue with trade-union, peasant, and human rights movements. In the 1980s and 1990s, the movement’s demands were partially incorporated into public policy as governments adopted gender policies and set up specialised state agencies. But this institutionalisation took place in contradiction with neoliberal hegemony, which i

Trump’s 2026 SOTU Speech: Economic Obfuscation and Political Theater

  Trump’s 2026 State of the Union speech was historic—but only in the sense of the longest ever at 1 hour and 47 minutes. Apart from that, the speech was one third misrepresentations about the state of the American economy followed by more than an hour of pure political theater which has come to increasingly presidential SOTU addresses in recent years. The misrepresentations of the state of the economy covered topics like inflation and cost of living, record stock market prices and asset wealth creation, his $5 trillion tax cuts almost all of which have accrued to corporations, businesses and investors, and his tariffs which have little to do with trade or economics and everything to do with raising revenue for defense spending and political intimidation of other countries. **JOBS** Treated very briefly in passing was the topic of jobs. Trump’s avoidance of the topic is understandable—given that this past year the US economy has created a total of only 181,000 jobs; i.e. barely 15,000 jobs month, a level which isn’t even sufficient to provide employment for new entrants to the labor force which ordinarily averages at least 100,000 every month. On the topic of jobs, Trump also made no mention whatsoever of the current unemployment level. When including involuntary part time, temp, and discouraged workers, as well as full time employed, per the government’s own estimates unemployment has been averaging around 8%. That’s more than 11 million US workers jobless! Moreover, even that 8% number excludes the 10 million workers who are self-employed independent contractors which government statistics conveniently ignore by classifying them as business owners, not workers. So the actual unemployment number of unemployed is thus at least 10% when properly estimated. Trump made passing reference to the fact that the 181,000 jobs created were 100% in the private sector—without indicating the number of course. Nor did he bother to mention that he managed to fire 27,000 federal government workers. It’s true, as he said, the US economy is at the highest employment levels ever in 2025—by 181,000 jobs of course. **ECONOMIC GROWTH** Another economic topic, this time completely unmentioned, was the overall real growth of the economy in 2025. Measured in Gross Domestic Product terms, GDP, the most generally accepted indicator, the US economy grew only 2.2% in all of last year! That’s down from 2.4% in 2024 before he was elected. More ominous, in the last three months of 2025 the economy slowed rapidly even more to only 1.4%. And it was actually even much slower, since the inflation adjustment used by the government, called the Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) price index notoriously underestimates inflation which, in turn, boosts the reported GDP numbers. If properly inflation adjusted, actual GDP in 2025 was closer to 1% than even the reported 2.2%. Nevertheless, Trump on several occasions bragged “we’re the hottest country in the world!” As for future economic growth Trump continually says other countries have promised to invest $18 trillion in the US economy! But virtually all of that are just verbal pledges, mostly designed no doubt to placate Trump during negotiations over tariffs. It’s difficult to see how the Europeans, Japanese and others—all of whose economies are either in recession or stagnant—are going to invest that amount in America’s economy instead of their own. **INFLATION** Trump did spend some time repeatedly claiming that inflation was reduced dramatically during his first year in office. More than once he proclaimed “inflation is plummeting”. He referenced what is called ‘core’ inflation in the PCE price index, which conveniently excludes food prices, housing costs, mortgage rates, and all other kinds of interest rates on autos, credit cards, and other loans—all of which rose last year. And there was a big problem with the PCE price-inflation index, whether ‘core’ or what’s called ‘headline’, which includes food and energy prices. Readers might think the PCE is constructed by the government going out and surveying a large sample of the millions of goods and services in the economy. It doesn’t. It takes a conglomeration of other surveys and estimations performed by the US Labor and Commerce Departments, puts their results together somehow, adds assumptions of its down, employs questionable methodologies, and comes up with a number that grossly underestimates actual prices in general. And here’s a bigger problem with the PCE in 2025. In the fourth quarter of 2025 the government shut down for six of the twelve weeks in the October-December period. During that period there were no surveys done by either the Labor or Comme

Poison at play: Unsafe lead levels found in half of New Orleans playgrounds

Sarah Hess started taking her toddler, Josie, to New Orleans’ Mickey Markey Playground in 2010 because she thought it would be a safe place to play after Josie had been diagnosed with lead poisoning. Hess had traced the problem to the crumbling paint in her family’s century-old home. While it underwent lead remediation, the family stayed in a newer, lead-free house in the Bywater neighborhood near Markey, where Josie regularly played on the swings and slides. “Everyone was telling us the safest place to play was outside at playgrounds, so that’s where we went,” Hess said. Josie’s next blood test was a shock. “It skyrocketed,” Hess said. Josie’s lead levels had leapt to nearly five times the national health standard. When the soil at Markey was tested in late 2010, it too was found to have dangerously high levels of lead. But the city took no meaningful action to inform Markey’s users or make the park safe. Parents started posting warning signs at the park and flooded City Hall with outraged calls and emails. Holding Josie in her arms, Hess made an impassioned speech to the City Council.  A child’s shoes are left in the dirt next to the playground at Mickey Markey Park in the Bywater neighborhood of New Orleans in November 2025. It’s common for children to play barefoot at this playground. Christiana Botic / Verite News and Catchlight Local / Report for America In short order, the city had hired a company to test Markey and other parks, and pledged to fix the lead problem wherever it was found. “I couldn’t have been more pleased,” Hess said. “They were totally into it. My impression was they were going to make them all lead-free parks.” But a Verite News investigation conducted over four months in 2025 found that lead pollution in New Orleans parks not only persists, it is more widespread than previously known. Dozens of city parks with playgrounds remain unsafe, including Markey and others that underwent city-sponsored lead remediation in 2011. The city does not appear to have conducted any major remediation or lead testing of parks since that time. The findings indicate that city officials fell short in their cleanup efforts then, and that a very large number of New Orleans children are exposed to excessive amounts of lead now, said Howard Mielke, a retired Tulane University toxicologist and one of the nation’s leading experts on lead contamination. “It’s a failed program,” he said. “They didn’t do what they needed to do to bring the lead levels down in a single park.” Verite News reporters tested hundreds of soil samples from 84 city parks with playgrounds in fall 2025. Adrienne Katner, a lead contamination researcher with Louisiana State University, verified the results. The testing found that about half the parks had lead concentrations that exceed [a federal hazard level](https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/biden-harris-administration-strengthens-safeguards-protect-families-and-children-lead) established in 2024 for soil in urban areas. “I am surprised they haven’t been tested and mitigated,” said Gabriel Filippelli, an Indiana University biochemist who studies lead exposure. “If there’s evidence of kids playing in soils that are as high as [Verite’s testing] described, that’s kind of horrifying.” Public health researchers and doctors say that children under 6 absorb lead-laden dust more easily than adults, contaminating their blood and harming the long-term development of their brains and nervous systems. There is no known safe exposure level for children, and even trace amounts can result in behavioral problems and lower cognitive abilities. ### **Find out what the lead levels are at New Orleans playgrounds** New Orleans is in financial straits with a [budget deficit](https://veritenews.org/2026/01/07/helena-moreno-interview-mayor/) of about $220 million, and it’s unclear what priority or resources Mayor Helena Moreno will, or even can, allocate to restart lead remediation efforts. In response to the financial crisis, Moreno has eliminated dozens of positions and plans to [furlough 700 employees](https://veritenews.org/2026/01/27/new-orleans-moreno-cuts-layoffs-deficit/) one day per pay period to save money. Moreno’s administration did not respond to requests for comment. The city doesn’t routinely test for lead in parks, said Larry Barabino, chief executive officer of the New Orleans Recreation Development, or NORD, Commission, the agency that oversees most of the city’s parklands. He confirmed the last significant effort to test parks ended in 2011. He called Verite’s results “definitely concerning” and pledged to work with city departments and local experts to potentially remediate unsafe parks. “Safety is our number one priority here at NORD,” Barabino said. “If there’s anythin