Enhance customer service with Zendesk AI agents: automate tasks, customize bots, and gain insights to boost performance. Start a free trial today.
I cannot provide a meaningful summary about "Ultimate" as a software tool based on the provided content. The social mentions you've shared appear to be unrelated political posts, news articles, and general content from Lemmy and Dev.to platforms that don't contain actual user reviews or mentions of a specific software product called "Ultimate." To provide an accurate analysis of user sentiment about Ultimate software, I would need reviews and social mentions that specifically discuss the software's features, performance, pricing, user experience, and other relevant aspects of the tool itself.
Mentions (30d)
2
Reviews
0
Platforms
3
Sentiment
0%
0 positive
I cannot provide a meaningful summary about "Ultimate" as a software tool based on the provided content. The social mentions you've shared appear to be unrelated political posts, news articles, and general content from Lemmy and Dev.to platforms that don't contain actual user reviews or mentions of a specific software product called "Ultimate." To provide an accurate analysis of user sentiment about Ultimate software, I would need reviews and social mentions that specifically discuss the software's features, performance, pricing, user experience, and other relevant aspects of the tool itself.
Features
Industry
information technology & services
Employees
240
Funding Stage
Merger / Acquisition
Total Funding
$28.6M
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) lays out the connections between Trump, Russia, and Epstein (transcript included)
**NOTE:** This transcript now appears in [the Senate section of the official *Congessional Record* of March 5, 2026, pages 18 - 23,](https://www.congress.gov/119/crec/2026/03/05/172/42/CREC-2026-03-05-senate.pdf) with Sen. Whitehouse's own list of sources appended. ----- The following is the YouTube transcript which I cleaned up, checked for errors, lightly edited for readability, verified spelling of proper names via Wikipedia, and added links to any quotes that I checked myself. (EDITED to add links to individuals mentioned, correct placement of quotes, and insert links to original articles where I could find them online) I found myself doing it anyway just for me, to keep track of who's who, and then I realized I might as well do it for you as well. This is an unparalleled speech: while the substance of it might be available elsewhere and I've just missed it, Sen. Whitehouse has answered a lot of questions in my mind about not just the links between Trump, Russia, and Epstein -- and William Barr as one of many links -- but also about the recording equipment and blackmail angle that is present in so many survivor accounts and so noticeably absent everywhere else. It's truly worth listening to, but if you can't sit still that long, here's the transcript. ----- Thank you, Madam President. It was the spring of 2019. Public and media interest in special counsel [Robert Mueller's report into Russia's election interference operation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_special_counsel_investigation) reached a fever pitch. There had been a steady drip, drip, drip of reporting on the Trump team's cozy and peculiar relationship with Russia. Since his surprise election victory in 2016, ahead of the Mueller report's release, Trump's Attorney General, Bill Barr, [issued a letter to Congress purporting to summarize the report's findings.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barr_letter) The letter declared that Russia and the Trump campaign did not collude to steal the election. The press, ravenous for any news of the long-anticipated Mueller report's conclusion, largely accepted [Attorney General Barr's](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Barr) narrow, carefully worded conclusion and, not yet having access to the full report, blasted the attorney general's summary around the world. Trump himself declared, all caps, NO COLLUSION. He said he had been cleared of the Russia "hoax," a term he reserves only to describe things that are true, like climate change. Frustrated, Mueller wrote to Barr that the attorney general's letter did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of the investigation. But by the time [the dense, voluminous Mueller report](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_report) was issued the month after Barr's letter, its message had been obscured. The Mueller report actually concluded that the Trump campaign knew of and welcomed Russian interference and expected to benefit from it. That conclusion was later echoed and reinforced by [an investigation led by then-chairman Marco Rubio's Senate Intelligence Committee,](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_report#Senate_Intelligence_Committee) a bipartisan report. But Barr's scheme had largely worked. Many in the media and in the Democratic Party seemed to internalize that the Russia speculation had perhaps gotten out of hand, and that perhaps we had been wrong to believe there was a troubling connection between Trump and Russia after all. But were we? Let's take a look at a sampling of what Trump has done for Russia just lately, and usually at the expense of American interests. There are many, but here's a top 10. **One,** after Trump and Vice President Vance theatrically chastised the heroic Ukrainian President Zelenskyy in front of TV cameras in the Oval Office last year, Trump paused our weapons shipments to Ukraine. **Two,** in July, during the worst Russian bombing campaign of the war until that point, Trump paused an already funded weapons shipment for Ukraine, including the Patriot interceptors that protect civilians from Putin's savage attacks. **Three,** that same month, Trump's Treasury Department stopped imposing new sanctions and closing sanctions loopholes, effectively allowing dummy corporations to send funds, chips, and military equipment to Russia. **Four,** leaked phone calls show that White House envoy [Steve Witkoff](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Witkoff) and Putin envoy [Kirill Dmitriev](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirill_Dmitriev) have worked together closely behind the scenes on a peace deal favorable to Russia. **Five,** last summer, Trump rolled out the presidential red carpet for the Russian dictator on American soil. with a summit in Alaska that yielded unsurprisingly no gains toward ending the war in Ukraine. **Six,** Trump's vice president traveled to the Munich Security Conference last year to parrot Russia's anti-western talking points pushed by right-wing groups that Puti
View originalThe Ultimate Job Finding-Management Tool
I need to go to bed but I want to share my excitement before I crash. I built a tool finally to help...
View originalBuilding an Agent SKILL for SeraProtocol: The Ultimate Guide to On-chain FX Automation
Introduction I have been sharing the charm of Sera Protocol through this...
View originalSen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) lays out the connections between Trump, Russia, and Epstein (transcript included)
**NOTE:** This transcript now appears in [the Senate section of the official *Congessional Record* of March 5, 2026, pages 18 - 23,](https://www.congress.gov/119/crec/2026/03/05/172/42/CREC-2026-03-05-senate.pdf) with Sen. Whitehouse's own list of sources appended. ----- The following is the YouTube transcript which I cleaned up, checked for errors, lightly edited for readability, verified spelling of proper names via Wikipedia, and added links to any quotes that I checked myself. (EDITED to add links to individuals mentioned, correct placement of quotes, and insert links to original articles where I could find them online) I found myself doing it anyway just for me, to keep track of who's who, and then I realized I might as well do it for you as well. This is an unparalleled speech: while the substance of it might be available elsewhere and I've just missed it, Sen. Whitehouse has answered a lot of questions in my mind about not just the links between Trump, Russia, and Epstein -- and William Barr as one of many links -- but also about the recording equipment and blackmail angle that is present in so many survivor accounts and so noticeably absent everywhere else. It's truly worth listening to, but if you can't sit still that long, here's the transcript. ----- Thank you, Madam President. It was the spring of 2019. Public and media interest in special counsel [Robert Mueller's report into Russia's election interference operation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_special_counsel_investigation) reached a fever pitch. There had been a steady drip, drip, drip of reporting on the Trump team's cozy and peculiar relationship with Russia. Since his surprise election victory in 2016, ahead of the Mueller report's release, Trump's Attorney General, Bill Barr, [issued a letter to Congress purporting to summarize the report's findings.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barr_letter) The letter declared that Russia and the Trump campaign did not collude to steal the election. The press, ravenous for any news of the long-anticipated Mueller report's conclusion, largely accepted [Attorney General Barr's](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Barr) narrow, carefully worded conclusion and, not yet having access to the full report, blasted the attorney general's summary around the world. Trump himself declared, all caps, NO COLLUSION. He said he had been cleared of the Russia "hoax," a term he reserves only to describe things that are true, like climate change. Frustrated, Mueller wrote to Barr that the attorney general's letter did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of the investigation. But by the time [the dense, voluminous Mueller report](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_report) was issued the month after Barr's letter, its message had been obscured. The Mueller report actually concluded that the Trump campaign knew of and welcomed Russian interference and expected to benefit from it. That conclusion was later echoed and reinforced by [an investigation led by then-chairman Marco Rubio's Senate Intelligence Committee,](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_report#Senate_Intelligence_Committee) a bipartisan report. But Barr's scheme had largely worked. Many in the media and in the Democratic Party seemed to internalize that the Russia speculation had perhaps gotten out of hand, and that perhaps we had been wrong to believe there was a troubling connection between Trump and Russia after all. But were we? Let's take a look at a sampling of what Trump has done for Russia just lately, and usually at the expense of American interests. There are many, but here's a top 10. **One,** after Trump and Vice President Vance theatrically chastised the heroic Ukrainian President Zelenskyy in front of TV cameras in the Oval Office last year, Trump paused our weapons shipments to Ukraine. **Two,** in July, during the worst Russian bombing campaign of the war until that point, Trump paused an already funded weapons shipment for Ukraine, including the Patriot interceptors that protect civilians from Putin's savage attacks. **Three,** that same month, Trump's Treasury Department stopped imposing new sanctions and closing sanctions loopholes, effectively allowing dummy corporations to send funds, chips, and military equipment to Russia. **Four,** leaked phone calls show that White House envoy [Steve Witkoff](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Witkoff) and Putin envoy [Kirill Dmitriev](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirill_Dmitriev) have worked together closely behind the scenes on a peace deal favorable to Russia. **Five,** last summer, Trump rolled out the presidential red carpet for the Russian dictator on American soil. with a summit in Alaska that yielded unsurprisingly no gains toward ending the war in Ukraine. **Six,** Trump's vice president traveled to the Munich Security Conference last year to parrot Russia's anti-western talking points pushed by right-wing groups that Puti
View originalIran Denies Asking Trump to Talk; Official Says No Negotiations Will Be Considered Until a New Supreme Leader Is Named
*Drop Site’s journalism is free to read because thousands of readers choose to fund it. If our work matters to you, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today.* [SUPPORT DSN - DONATE TODAY](https://givebutter.com/dsn-substack) [](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!LF-m!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ffbf894e6-52da-4265-bceb-af2288006860_7163x5059.jpeg) Iranian protesters carry images of the late Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and Iranian flags in an anti-U.S.-Israeli rally in Tehran, Iran, on March 6, 2026, after Friday prayers outside Imam Khomeini Grand Mosque. Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images. Since launching a scorched earth bombing campaign against Iran on February 28 despite ongoing negotiations, President Donald Trump has repeatedly sought to portray the Iranian government as cowering in the face of American might, appealing to him to make a deal to end the war. “They have no air defense. All of their airplanes are gone. Their communications are gone. Missiles are gone. Launches are gone. About 60% and 64%, respectively. Other than that, they’re doing quite well,” Trump quipped on Thursday. “And they’re calling. They’re saying, ‘How do we make a deal?’ I said, ‘You’re being a little bit late,’ and we want to fight now more than they do.” Trump’s claims that Iran has sought to negotiate a ceasefire with the U.S. are a “huge lie,” a senior Iranian official told Drop Site. On Thursday, Abbas Araghchi similarly [told NBC News](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlnbouKHDhs) that Iran has not had any communications with the U.S. through backchannels since his meeting in Geneva last week with Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner. “No, not after Thursday that we met last time. We met last Thursday. We negotiated for almost seven hours,” he said. “No negotiations from the Iranian side are conceivable until the official announcement by the Supreme Leader of Iran,” the senior official, who is not authorized to speak publicly on the matter, said. “The decision of Iran’s military forces is the continuation of the defense of the country against attacks by Israel and the United States, and the long-term management of the war imposed by foreign forces.” [Subscribe now](https://www.dropsitenews.com/subscribe?) Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and other senior Iranian leaders were assassinated last Saturday in the opening strikes of the U.S. war. The Iranian government moved swiftly to name an interim leadership council consisting of President Masoud Pezeshkian, Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Ejei, the head of Iran’s judiciary, and Ayatollah Ali Arafi, a prominent member of Iran’s Guardian Council and Assembly of Experts—the body that is ultimately responsible for choosing the country’s Supreme Leader. Iran is expected to name a new Supreme Leader in the coming days. Some reports indicate that a leader may already have been selected by the Assembly of Experts. “The voting has been conducted,” the Iranian official told Drop Site. “Security and protection measures for the new leader must be put in place before they can announce his name.” While Iran denied communications with the U.S., the official said other nations had reached out to Iran appealing for it to consider discussing a ceasefire. “Our assessment is that the USA side has requested their mediation. These requests have so far been rejected by our side,” the official said, adding that he believed such claims by Trump were part of a broader propaganda campaign. “Some countries have begun mediation efforts,” Pezeshkian [said](https://x.com/drpezeshkian/status/2029877231942590545) on Friday. “Let’s be clear: we are committed to lasting peace in the region yet we have no hesitation in defending our nation’s dignity and sovereignty. Mediation should address those who underestimated the Iranian people and ignited this conflict.” Pezeshkian did not offer any details on the nature of these diplomatic initiatives. Soon after Pezeshkian’s statement was posted on X/Twitter, Trump took to Truth Social to demand full capitulation from Iran. “There will be no deal with Iran except UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!” Trump wrote on Friday. “After that, and the selection of a GREAT & ACCEPTABLE Leader(s), we, and many of our wonderful and very brave allies and partners, will work tirelessly to bring Iran back from the brink of destruction, making it economically bigger, better, and stronger than ever before. IRAN WILL HAVE A GREAT FUTURE. ‘MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN (MIGA!).’” On Wednesday, in an [interview](https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/exclusive-in
View originalIran Denies Asking Trump to Talk; Official Says No Negotiations Will Be Considered Until a New Supreme Leader Is Named
*Drop Site’s journalism is free to read because thousands of readers choose to fund it. If our work matters to you, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today.* [SUPPORT DSN - DONATE TODAY](https://givebutter.com/dsn-substack) [](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!LF-m!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ffbf894e6-52da-4265-bceb-af2288006860_7163x5059.jpeg) Iranian protesters carry images of the late Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and Iranian flags in an anti-U.S.-Israeli rally in Tehran, Iran, on March 6, 2026, after Friday prayers outside Imam Khomeini Grand Mosque. Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images. Since launching a scorched earth bombing campaign against Iran on February 28 despite ongoing negotiations, President Donald Trump has repeatedly sought to portray the Iranian government as cowering in the face of American might, appealing to him to make a deal to end the war. “They have no air defense. All of their airplanes are gone. Their communications are gone. Missiles are gone. Launches are gone. About 60% and 64%, respectively. Other than that, they’re doing quite well,” Trump quipped on Thursday. “And they’re calling. They’re saying, ‘How do we make a deal?’ I said, ‘You’re being a little bit late,’ and we want to fight now more than they do.” Trump’s claims that Iran has sought to negotiate a ceasefire with the U.S. are a “huge lie,” a senior Iranian official told Drop Site. On Thursday, Abbas Araghchi similarly [told NBC News](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlnbouKHDhs) that Iran has not had any communications with the U.S. through backchannels since his meeting in Geneva last week with Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner. “No, not after Thursday that we met last time. We met last Thursday. We negotiated for almost seven hours,” he said. “No negotiations from the Iranian side are conceivable until the official announcement by the Supreme Leader of Iran,” the senior official, who is not authorized to speak publicly on the matter, said. “The decision of Iran’s military forces is the continuation of the defense of the country against attacks by Israel and the United States, and the long-term management of the war imposed by foreign forces.” [Subscribe now](https://www.dropsitenews.com/subscribe?) Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and other senior Iranian leaders were assassinated last Saturday in the opening strikes of the U.S. war. The Iranian government moved swiftly to name an interim leadership council consisting of President Masoud Pezeshkian, Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Ejei, the head of Iran’s judiciary, and Ayatollah Ali Arafi, a prominent member of Iran’s Guardian Council and Assembly of Experts—the body that is ultimately responsible for choosing the country’s Supreme Leader. Iran is expected to name a new Supreme Leader in the coming days. Some reports indicate that a leader may already have been selected by the Assembly of Experts. “The voting has been conducted,” the Iranian official told Drop Site. “Security and protection measures for the new leader must be put in place before they can announce his name.” While Iran denied communications with the U.S., the official said other nations had reached out to Iran appealing for it to consider discussing a ceasefire. “Our assessment is that the USA side has requested their mediation. These requests have so far been rejected by our side,” the official said, adding that he believed such claims by Trump were part of a broader propaganda campaign. “Some countries have begun mediation efforts,” Pezeshkian [said](https://x.com/drpezeshkian/status/2029877231942590545) on Friday. “Let’s be clear: we are committed to lasting peace in the region yet we have no hesitation in defending our nation’s dignity and sovereignty. Mediation should address those who underestimated the Iranian people and ignited this conflict.” Pezeshkian did not offer any details on the nature of these diplomatic initiatives. Soon after Pezeshkian’s statement was posted on X/Twitter, Trump took to Truth Social to demand full capitulation from Iran. “There will be no deal with Iran except UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!” Trump wrote on Friday. “After that, and the selection of a GREAT & ACCEPTABLE Leader(s), we, and many of our wonderful and very brave allies and partners, will work tirelessly to bring Iran back from the brink of destruction, making it economically bigger, better, and stronger than ever before. IRAN WILL HAVE A GREAT FUTURE. ‘MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN (MIGA!).’” On Wednesday, in an [interview](https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/exclusive-in
View originalTrump’s $1.5 Trillion “Dream Military”
 Image by Diego González. What constitutes national security and how is it best achieved? Does massive military spending really make a country more secure, and what perils to democracy and liberty are posed by vast military establishments? Questions like those are rarely addressed in honest ways these days in America. Instead, the Trump administration favors preparations for war and more war, fueled by potentially enormous increases in military spending that are dishonestly framed as “[recapitalizations](https://theintercept.com/2025/12/08/air-force-hegseth-ken-wilsbach-nuclear-weapons/)” of America’s security and safety. Such framing makes Pete Hegseth, America’s self-styled “secretary of war,” seem almost refreshing in his embrace of a [warrior ethos](https://www.businessinsider.com/hegseths-warrior-ethos-speech-now-mandatory-viewing-for-military-2025-10). Republican Senator Lindsey Graham is another “warrior” who [cheers for conflict](https://www.foxnews.com/politics/graham-suggests-trump-help-iran-protesters-military-cyber-psychological-attacks-against-regime), whether with Venezuela, Iran, or even — yes! — Russia. Such [macho men](https://bracingviews.com/2016/08/03/too-many-troops-have-died-in-the-name-of-big-boy-pants-2/) revel in what they believe is this country’s divine mission to dominate the world. Tragically, at the moment, unapologetic warmongers like Hegseth and Graham are winning the political and cultural battle here in America. Of course, U.S. warmongering is anything but new, as is a belief in global dominance through high military spending. Way back in 1983, as a college student, I worked on a project that critiqued President Ronald Reagan’s “defense” buildup and his embrace of pie-in-the-sky concepts like the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), better known as “Star Wars.” Never did I imagine that, more than 40 years later, another Republican president would again come to embrace SDI (freshly rebranded as “[Golden Dome](https://jacobin.com/2025/11/trump-golden-dome-nuclear-defense)”) and ever-more massive military spending, especially since the Soviet Union, America’s superpower rival in Reagan’s time, ceased to exist 35 years ago. Amazingly, Trump even wants to bring back naval battleships, as Reagan briefly did (though he didn’t have the temerity to call for a new class of ships to be named after himself). It’ll be a “[golden fleet](https://breakingdefense.com/2026/01/first-trump-class-battleship-could-cost-over-20-billion-cbo/),” says Trump. What gives? For much of my life, I’ve tried to answer that very question. Soon after retiring from the U.S. Air Force, I started writing for *TomDispatch*, penning my first article there in 2007, asking Americans to [save the military](https://tomdispatch.com/astore-on-a-military-bemedaled-bothered-and-beleaguered/) from itself and especially from its “surge” illusions in the Iraq War. Tom Engelhardt and I, as well as Andrew Bacevich, Michael Klare, and [Bill Hartung](https://tomdispatch.com/venezuela-the-revival-of-regime-change/), among others, have spilled much ink (symbolically speaking in this online era) at *TomDispatch* urging that America’s military-industrial complex be reined in and reformed. Trump’s recent advocacy of a “[dream military](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-proposes-massive-increase-in-2027-defense-spending-to-1-5-trillion-to-build-dream-military)” with a proposed budget of $1.5 trillion in 2027 (half a trillion dollars larger than the present Pentagon budget) was backed by places like the [editorial board of the *Washington Post*](https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/01/14/trump-defense-spending-trillion/), which just shows how frustratingly ineffectual our efforts have been. How discouraging, and again, what gives? Sometimes (probably too often), I seek sanctuary from the hell we’re living through in glib phrases that mask my despair. So, I’ll write something like: *America isn’t a shining city on a hill, it’s a bristling fortress in a* [*valley of death*](https://bracingviews.substack.com/p/tis-the-season-for-war); or, *At the Pentagon, nothing succeeds like failure*, a reference to [eight failed audits](https://www.reuters.com/world/us/pentagon-fails-eighth-audit-targets-2028-pass-pentagon-says-2025-12-19/) in a row (part of a [30-year pattern](https://www.stephensemler.com/p/house-boosts-military-budget-as-pentagon) of financial finagling) that accompanied disastrous wars in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere. Such phrases, no matter how clever I thought they were, made absolutely no impression when it came to slowing the growth of militarism in America. In essence, I’ve been bringing the online equivalent of a fountain pen to a gun fight, which has proved to be anything but a recipe for success. In America, nothing — and I
View originalJailbreak wiki - yell0wfever92 [Mod]
Welcome to the wiki for ChatGPTJailbreak.tech I'm the lead mod, yell0wfever92, and this is where I will be sharing all of the things I've picked up about jailbreaking LLMs. This document will use ChatGPT as the reference model on the OpenAI platform; be aware that there are many other LLMs out there with their own platforms that can also be jailbroken such as **Claude** (by Anthropic), **Gemini** (by Google), **Llama** (by Meta, less used for jailbreaking here) and more. Please be aware that most assertions I make about the nature of Large Language Models are speculative. There currently lacks a unified field of study for the subcategory of prompt engineering known as jailbreaking, so take what I say here as food for thought based on informed experience and not authoritative literature. ### What is jailbreaking? Jailbreak (n.): A prompt that is uniquely structured to elicit “adverse” outputs (those considered harmful or unethical) from an LLM; these often involve a context of some sort that directs the model's attention elsewhere while the adverse request is subtly or quietly included. Example types of jailbreaks include but are not limited to roleplay, chain-of-thought (step-by-step thinking), token manipulation, zero-shot, few-shot, many-shot, prompt injection, memory injection and even reverse psychology. /// Jailbreaking (v.): The act of jailbreaking an LLM. Variations in words and word tense include “jailbroke”, “jailbroken”, and “bypassing”. /// Jailbreaker(s) (n.): An individual or individuals with a degree of skill in the art of prompting for adverse outputs. What OpenAI probably considers “an asshole”. ### **Universality Tiers** Check out this table if you want to evaluate a jailbreak's power. ### **Common Terminology** See this section to understand the meaning of inputs, outputs, and other important aspects of interacting with (and jailbreaking) LLMs. ### [The Context Window] One of the most important aspects of chatting with an LLM surrounds the context window, as it determines how long your conversations go before the AI loses track of the earliest parts - and by extension, how long before it starts forgetting you jailbroke it. If you were only going to choose one part to read in this entire guide, I would strongly suggest you pick this one. # Ethics and Legality Surrounding Jailbreaking LLMs ### Why People Jailbreak 1. To test the boundaries of the safeguards imposed on it 2. Dissatisfaction with the base LLM's “neutered”/walk-on-eggshells conversational approach (my initial motive) 3. To develop one's own prompt engineering skills (my current motive) 4. Good ol' boredom & curiosity 5. Actual malicious intent 6. Smut 7. Regulated industry outputs * Regulated industry outputs are forbidden responses asserting information from a government-regulated field. Examples are industries like finance, the legal system, law in general, and healthcare. AI companies do not want to shoulder liability for information their bots provide that may prove incorrect and result in “high-impact” consequences. To illustrate what “high-impact” consequences looks like, you may have seen stories like the [Stanford misinformation expert with zero sense of irony](https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/stanford-expert-gpt-minnesota-deepfakes-19954595.php) who used hallucinated info for a **legal filing** or the [lawyers in New York who were disbarred](https://www.reuters.com/legal/new-york-lawyers-sanctioned-using-fake-chatgpt-cases-legal-brief-2023-06-22) for doing something similarly stupid. ### Is jailbreaking even legal? LLMs will insist all day and swear up and down that you're edging the lines of the law when you jailbreak them, but that is not true. There's nothing currently in any legal text (within the United States, at least) that forbids using prompt engineering to bypass internal safeguards in LLMs. That being said, getting an LLM like ChatGPT to do anything aside from its intended purpose (as defined by the particular company's Terms of Service) technically falls under “disallowed actions”. But Terms of Service are not law no matter how badly corporations would prefer you believed that, so the answer to that question is **yes, as of this writing it's legal**. Just keep in mind that you can still technically lose account access from whichever platform you're jailbreaking on, though this is rare. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ## New to the community? Test out some of the jailbreaks that have been featured using these links * [yell0wfever92’s custom GPTs](https://chatgptjailbreak.tech/post/12947) * [V - Not your typical AI assistant](https://chatgptjailbreak.tech/post/13730) * [DAN (Do Anything Now)](https://chatgptjailbreak.tech/post/21333) ### Why jailbreaking works in the first place AI is designed to be the ultimate “yes-man”; the helper you never had. Therefore it is hardwired at it
View originalThe Seven Richest Billionaires Are All Media Barons
cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/15136 > [](https://www.mintpressnews.com/donations/) > > Trump loyalist and CIA contractor Larry Ellison’s purchase of CNN appears imminent, and marks the latest venture into media for the world’s second-richest individual. But Ellison is not alone. Indeed, the world’s seven richest individuals are all now powerful media barons, controlling what the world sees, reads, and hears, marking a new chapter in oligarchical control over society and striking another blow at a free, independent press and diversity of opinion. > > Media Monopoly > -------------- > > Paramount Skydance– an Ellison-owned company– is in pole position to purchase Warner Brothers Discovery, a conglomerate that controls gigantic film and television studios, streaming services like HBO Max and Discovery+, franchises like DC Comics, and TV networks such as HBO, TNT, Discovery Channel, TLC, Food Network, and CNN. This lead is largely due to Ellison’s proximity to President Trump, who will ultimately have to sign off on such a deal. > > Ellison has already [spoken](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/nov/20/warner-bros-discovery-takeover-paramount-skydance-larry-ellison) to senior White House officials about axing CNN hosts and content that Trump is said to dislike, including anchors, Erin Burnett and Brianna Keilar. It is this willingness to completely reorientate the network’s political direction that has made him the White House’s preferred purchaser of Warner Brothers Discovery. He is reportedly so wealthy that he can afford to pay in cash. > > Ellison, whose [net worth](https://www.forbes.com/real-time-billionaires/) stands at a staggering $278 billion, has been on a media spending spree of late. Earlier this year, he provided the funds for Skydance to [purchase](https://www.mintpressnews.com/israels-biggest-us-donor-now-owns-cbs/290347/) Paramount Global, another gigantic conglomerate that controls such products as CBS, BET, MTV, Comedy Central, Nickelodeon, Paramount Streaming, and Showtime. > > Immediately upon being appointed CEO of CBS News, Larry’s son, David, began drastically reorientating the network’s political outlook, firing staff, pushing it to become pro-Trump, and appointing [self-described](https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/media/2025/06/blind-support-for-israel-has-muzzled-bari-weisss-free-press) “Zionist fanatic” Bari Weiss as its editor-in-chief. > > The Ellison family, however, is far from finished. In September, President Trump signed an executive order approving a proposal to force through the sale of social media platform TikTok to an American consortium led by Ellison-owned tech company, Oracle. > > Under the planned arrangement, Oracle will oversee the platform’s security and operations, giving the world’s second-richest man effective control over the platform that [more than](https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/12/20/8-facts-about-americans-and-tiktok/) 60% of Americans under thirty years of age use for news and entertainment. Trump himself stated that he was extremely pleased that Oracle would be controlling the platform. “It’s owned by Americans, and very sophisticated Americans,” he [said](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/25/trump-approves-tiktok-deal-through-executive-order.html). > > The Ellison family’s sudden venture into the realm of media and communications has shocked many, with senior media figures sounding the alarm. Longtime CBS News anchor, Dan Rather, [warned](https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/dan-rather-warns-against-ellisons-buying-warner-bros-1236371969/) that “we all have to be concerned about the consolidation of huge billionaires getting control of nearly all of the major news outlets.” “It is a particularly tough time for anybody working at CBS News,” he stated, citing pressure to change coverage to be more pro-Trump. “I think if [the Ellisons] were to buy CNN, it would change CNN forever, and it might be another very serious wound to CBS News,” he concluded. > > Billionaire Capture > ------------------- > > Rather is correct. No other period in history has seen such a rapid and overwhelming buy up of our means of communications by the billionaire class – a fact that raises tough questions about freedom of speech and diversity of opinion. Today, the world’s seven richest individuals are all major media barons, giving them extraordinary control over our media and public square, allowing them to set agendas, and suppress forms of speech they do not approve of. This includes criticisms of them and their holdings, the economic system we live under, and the actions of the United States and Israeli governments. > > Sitting on a fortune of over $480 billion, Elon Musk is the [wealthiest]
View originalThe Seven Richest Billionaires Are All Media Barons
[](https://www.mintpressnews.com/donations/) Trump loyalist and CIA contractor Larry Ellison’s purchase of CNN appears imminent, and marks the latest venture into media for the world’s second-richest individual. But Ellison is not alone. Indeed, the world’s seven richest individuals are all now powerful media barons, controlling what the world sees, reads, and hears, marking a new chapter in oligarchical control over society and striking another blow at a free, independent press and diversity of opinion. Media Monopoly -------------- Paramount Skydance– an Ellison-owned company– is in pole position to purchase Warner Brothers Discovery, a conglomerate that controls gigantic film and television studios, streaming services like HBO Max and Discovery+, franchises like DC Comics, and TV networks such as HBO, TNT, Discovery Channel, TLC, Food Network, and CNN. This lead is largely due to Ellison’s proximity to President Trump, who will ultimately have to sign off on such a deal. Ellison has already [spoken](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/nov/20/warner-bros-discovery-takeover-paramount-skydance-larry-ellison) to senior White House officials about axing CNN hosts and content that Trump is said to dislike, including anchors, Erin Burnett and Brianna Keilar. It is this willingness to completely reorientate the network’s political direction that has made him the White House’s preferred purchaser of Warner Brothers Discovery. He is reportedly so wealthy that he can afford to pay in cash. Ellison, whose [net worth](https://www.forbes.com/real-time-billionaires/) stands at a staggering $278 billion, has been on a media spending spree of late. Earlier this year, he provided the funds for Skydance to [purchase](https://www.mintpressnews.com/israels-biggest-us-donor-now-owns-cbs/290347/) Paramount Global, another gigantic conglomerate that controls such products as CBS, BET, MTV, Comedy Central, Nickelodeon, Paramount Streaming, and Showtime. Immediately upon being appointed CEO of CBS News, Larry’s son, David, began drastically reorientating the network’s political outlook, firing staff, pushing it to become pro-Trump, and appointing [self-described](https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/media/2025/06/blind-support-for-israel-has-muzzled-bari-weisss-free-press) “Zionist fanatic” Bari Weiss as its editor-in-chief. The Ellison family, however, is far from finished. In September, President Trump signed an executive order approving a proposal to force through the sale of social media platform TikTok to an American consortium led by Ellison-owned tech company, Oracle. Under the planned arrangement, Oracle will oversee the platform’s security and operations, giving the world’s second-richest man effective control over the platform that [more than](https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/12/20/8-facts-about-americans-and-tiktok/) 60% of Americans under thirty years of age use for news and entertainment. Trump himself stated that he was extremely pleased that Oracle would be controlling the platform. “It’s owned by Americans, and very sophisticated Americans,” he [said](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/25/trump-approves-tiktok-deal-through-executive-order.html). The Ellison family’s sudden venture into the realm of media and communications has shocked many, with senior media figures sounding the alarm. Longtime CBS News anchor, Dan Rather, [warned](https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/dan-rather-warns-against-ellisons-buying-warner-bros-1236371969/) that “we all have to be concerned about the consolidation of huge billionaires getting control of nearly all of the major news outlets.” “It is a particularly tough time for anybody working at CBS News,” he stated, citing pressure to change coverage to be more pro-Trump. “I think if [the Ellisons] were to buy CNN, it would change CNN forever, and it might be another very serious wound to CBS News,” he concluded. Billionaire Capture ------------------- Rather is correct. No other period in history has seen such a rapid and overwhelming buy up of our means of communications by the billionaire class – a fact that raises tough questions about freedom of speech and diversity of opinion. Today, the world’s seven richest individuals are all major media barons, giving them extraordinary control over our media and public square, allowing them to set agendas, and suppress forms of speech they do not approve of. This includes criticisms of them and their holdings, the economic system we live under, and the actions of the United States and Israeli governments. Sitting on a fortune of over $480 billion, Elon Musk is the [wealthiest](https://www.forbes.com/real-time-billionaires/) person in world history, and is [projected](https://time.com/7333033/elon-musk-trillionaires-democracy-campaign-finance-wealth-gap/) to, with
View originalUltimate uses a subscription + tiered pricing model. Visit their website for current pricing details.
Key features include: Offer nonstop, personalized service, Get started in minutes, not months, Trust every automated resolution, Built into the Resolution Platform, 30% — Start fast with generative AI, 50% — Resolve complex requests from start to finish, 60% — Optimize every interaction, 80% — Expand what’s possible with AI.
Based on user reviews and social mentions, the most common pain points are: $500 bill.
Based on 14 social mentions analyzed, 0% of sentiment is positive, 100% neutral, and 0% negative.
Pushmeet Kohli
VP Research at Google DeepMind (AlphaFold)
2 mentions
